On the morning of June 22, a new survey by SellCell, a foreign mobile phone price comparison website, showed that users do not seem to be so interested in Apple’s upcoming iOS 15 and iPadOS 15 systems.
The survey polled 3,000 iPhone and iPad users in the U.S. aged 18 and over, split evenly between men and women, to ask about their opinions on “iOS 15,” “iPadOS 15,” and the naming of the upcoming iPhone series.
More than 50% of respondents said they were only “mildly” or “not at all” excited about the iOS 15 and iPadOS 15 updates. 28.1% found the updates “somewhat” exciting, and only 19.3% were “very” or “extremely” excited about them.
In iOS 15 and iPadOS 15, 23% of users said the most exciting upgrade is ID cards in the Wallet app, 17.3% of users are most interested in enhanced Spotlight search, and 14.2% of users are most interested in the new "Find My" feature.
Few respondents were fascinated by the new features of iOS 15 and iPadOS 15. Less than 1% of respondents considered iMessage's "Shared with You" feature, the upgrades to the health system (including fall risk indicators and data sharing), and improvements to Apple Maps (including more traffic details and AR walking directions) as the best new features. Spatial audio, screen sharing, grid view and portrait mode, a redesigned notification system, and improvements to FaceTime only attracted about 5% of respondents.
When asked what features respondents thought should be added to iOS 15 and iPadOS 15, 32.3% said there should be interactive widgets, 21% said there should be an always-on display feature (showing the time when the screen is off), 14.9% said professional apps like Xcode or Final Cut Pro should be added to the iPad system, and 13.2% said there should be better external display support for the iPad.
It should be said that the software system itself is not as attractive as hardware, so it is normal that the survey data is relatively general.
In addition to the iOS 15 and iPadOS 15 updates, the survey also investigated the naming of the upcoming new iPhone. As we all know, 13 is not an auspicious number abroad. As many as one in five iPhone and iPad users said they would postpone changing their phones because of the name "iPhone 13". 26% of people think "iPhone 13" is the best name, and most of the responses believe that the devices should not be called "iPhone 13": 38% said Apple should simply call its next smartphone series "iPhone (2021)", and 13% thought it should be called "iPhone 12s".
Previous article:China Mobile calls Hongmeng a pirated Android? Official response: It’s completely false
Next article:ASA is now available on the Chinese App Store, a new channel for gaining volume
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- Apple and Samsung reportedly failed to develop ultra-thin high-density batteries, iPhone 17 Air and Galaxy S25 Slim phones became thicker
- Micron will appear at the 2024 CIIE, continue to deepen its presence in the Chinese market and lead sustainable development
- Qorvo: Innovative technologies lead the next generation of mobile industry
- BOE exclusively supplies Nubia and Red Magic flagship new products with a new generation of under-screen display technology, leading the industry into the era of true full-screen
- OPPO and Hong Kong Polytechnic University renew cooperation to upgrade innovation research center and expand new boundaries of AI imaging
- Gurman: Vision Pro will upgrade the chip, Apple is also considering launching glasses connected to the iPhone
- OnePlus 13 officially released: the first flagship of the new decade is "Super Pro in every aspect"
- Goodix Technology helps iQOO 13 create a new flagship experience for e-sports performance
- BOE's new generation of light-emitting devices empowers iQOO 13 to fully lead the flexible display industry to a new level of performance
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- CGD and Qorvo to jointly revolutionize motor control solutions
- CGD and Qorvo to jointly revolutionize motor control solutions
- Keysight Technologies FieldFox handheld analyzer with VDI spread spectrum module to achieve millimeter wave analysis function
- Infineon's PASCO2V15 XENSIV PAS CO2 5V Sensor Now Available at Mouser for Accurate CO2 Level Measurement
- Advanced gameplay, Harting takes your PCB board connection to a new level!
- Advanced gameplay, Harting takes your PCB board connection to a new level!
- A new chapter in Great Wall Motors R&D: solid-state battery technology leads the future
- Naxin Micro provides full-scenario GaN driver IC solutions
- Interpreting Huawei’s new solid-state battery patent, will it challenge CATL in 2030?
- Are pure electric/plug-in hybrid vehicles going crazy? A Chinese company has launched the world's first -40℃ dischargeable hybrid battery that is not afraid of cold
- Keys? No more! The future of car access systems is here
- [ESP32-Korvo Review] 05 Development Environment Construction Part 2
- SIMETRIX/SIMPLIS simulation tutorials and examples
- What is IoT
- [SC8905 EVM Review] + Found an error in the User Guide
- [Ready to use] LIS2DTW12 functional demonstration project (STM32G474)
- Code migration process of MSPBoot
- Why is there a 2 in the denominator when calculating the baud rate of the serial port communication of the 51 single-chip microcomputer? I have always wondered why it is divided by 2
- Please share the basic principles of 5G
- Why does the g2553 circuit board omit the external 32.768k crystal oscillator?