The U.S. government's efforts to exclude Chinese companies from its communications networks continue, Light Reading reported.
This week, Pacific Networks and its subsidiary ComNet said they hope the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will not shut down their U.S. operations.
In addition, FCC lawyers provided legal grounds for banning US telecommunications companies from using Huawei equipment.
At the same time, the UK has also been affected by the US actions against China, and the British government is discussing whether to comply with the US requirements and completely ban Huawei from entering the country's telecommunications market.
"The Chinese government has never asked our two companies to take any action that would 'endanger the national security and law enforcement interests of the United States,' and our two companies will not be easily influenced and controlled by the Chinese government." Pacific Networks and ComNet said in the documents submitted to the FCC. "On the contrary, Pacific Networks and ComNet have provided excellent services to customers, have always complied with FCC regulations, and have been cooperating with U.S. national security and law enforcement agencies."
Pacific Networks and ComNet are two of four Chinese telecommunications companies targeted by the FCC as potential risks to U.S. national security.
Following its ban on China Mobile from building telecommunications facilities in the United States, the FCC in April opened new proceedings against China Telecom Americas, China Unicom Americas, Pacific Networks and its wholly owned subsidiary ComNet, requiring them to provide reasons why the agency should not initiate proceedings to revoke their authorizations, enabling them to conduct business in the United States.
In a 92-page response document, Pacific Networks and ComNet said the FCC's threat to ban them from the U.S. market was "unnecessary and unfounded."
They disputed the basic premise of the FCC's inquiry.
"The FCC took these actions solely because we are a company that is indirectly owned more than 50% by a Chinese government-owned investment firm, and not because they identified any Chinese government interference or vulnerabilities in our operations and networks," Pacific Networks and ComNet wrote. "Rather than citing any specific misconduct by either company that would result in the revocation of our licenses and, therefore, a prohibition on providing telecommunications services to the public, the FCC cited the FCC's actions in its 2019 China Mobile Order and asserted that there are general concerns about the increased national security and law enforcement risks posed by China since these Chinese companies (without singling out Pacific Networks or ComNet) were licensed."
The two companies also provided details of their respective businesses and ownership structures.
According to Reuters, two other Chinese companies targeted by the FCC - China Telecom Americas and China Unicom Americas - have not yet responded to the agency's actions.
Previous article:Canadian telecom companies target Ericsson and Nokia to ditch Huawei
Next article:GSA: 5G commercial devices exceed 100
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- Keysight Technologies FieldFox handheld analyzer with VDI spread spectrum module to achieve millimeter wave analysis function
- Qualcomm launches its first RISC-V architecture programmable connectivity module QCC74xM, supporting Wi-Fi 6 and other protocols
- Microchip Launches Broadest Portfolio of IGBT 7 Power Devices Designed for Sustainable Development, E-Mobility and Data Center Applications
- Infineon Technologies Launches New High-Performance Microcontroller AURIX™ TC4Dx
- Rambus Announces Industry’s First HBM4 Controller IP to Accelerate Next-Generation AI Workloads
- NXP FRDM platform promotes wireless connectivity
- WPG Group launches Wi-Fi 7 home gateway solution based on Qualcomm products
- Exclusive interview with Silicon Labs: In-depth discussion on the future development trend of Bluetooth 6.0
- Works With Online Developer Conference is about to start, experience the essence of global activities online
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- Detailed explanation of intelligent car body perception system
- How to solve the problem that the servo drive is not enabled
- Why does the servo drive not power on?
- What point should I connect to when the servo is turned on?
- How to turn on the internal enable of Panasonic servo drive?
- What is the rigidity setting of Panasonic servo drive?
- How to change the inertia ratio of Panasonic servo drive
- What is the inertia ratio of the servo motor?
- Is it better for the motor to have a large or small moment of inertia?
- What is the difference between low inertia and high inertia of servo motors?
- [N32L43X Review] 1. Getting Started Environment Configuration
- Tektronix THz Radar Signal Test Solution
- [RISC-V MCU CH32V103 Review] - 5: Failed to leave API and enter Assembly, returned to API......
- BQ76940 sampling chip damage issue
- [RVB2601 Creative Application Development] LoRa Gateway Wireless Host Computer
- Newcomer Report
- There is a program with a total of 10 feeders
- Application of TI's high-performance charging and discharging solution in battery test equipment (Battery Test System)
- About the multi-channel link problem of sim7600ce
- Smart network desk lamp, project submission