The automotive industry is currently studying how to safely deploy autonomous driving on a large scale, and must be able to cope with various key challenges at the L4 and even L5 levels. In addition, the complexity of automotive electronic systems is also growing rapidly. While requiring computing power to keep pace with the growth in complexity, how to ensure the system's power consumption, heat dissipation, size, cost and safety are also important factors that automakers and solution providers need to consider.
7 key challenges
1. Cost
Some predict that if L4 and L5 autonomous vehicles are produced in 2020, the cost may be $75,000 to $100,000 more than a regular car. In fact, this number is too low considering the number of sensors required to achieve L4 and L5 autonomous driving. If the total cost exceeds $100,000, in order for these vehicles to be purchased, the price will need to drop significantly to make them affordable to consumers. Therefore, this will most likely mean that the first vehicles to be truly deployed for autonomous driving will be part of Mobility as a Service (MaaS), ride-sharing, or robot taxi fleets, establishing a new business model to support these more expensive vehicles by replacing the cost of human driving.
2 Can L3 really be deployed?
As shown in the figure above, L3 is the first step from ADAS to fully autonomous driving. It means that when conditions permit, the vehicle can complete all driving actions and has the function of reminding the driver. The driver does not need to monitor the driving environment and can be distracted, but cannot sleep. He needs to be able to take over the vehicle at any time to deal with possible situations that artificial intelligence cannot handle. This leads to an interesting phenomenon. Once the driver's hands are off the steering wheel, he will happily handle emails, texts, etc., so that his eyes and thoughts are also off the road. Once an accident occurs, how quickly can the distracted driver return to the "steering wheel"? From the perspective of the division of responsibilities, skipping L3 autonomous driving can better judge whether the driver is controlling the vehicle or the vehicle is driving autonomously. However, even if automakers decide to skip the L3 stage, the technical complexity required to go from L3 to L4 is much higher.
3 The drastic increase in computing requirements of sensors
Moving from ADAS to autonomous driving requires a more precise understanding of everything around the car, and to achieve this, the number of sensors on the car has increased dramatically, requiring multiple radars, on-board cameras, and lidar to essentially replace and enhance human eye perception. These sensors are not only expensive, but also require processor processing to understand what they "see" and changes in the situation outside the car, which is very different from the computing power required for simple ADAS functions such as adaptive cruise control or emergency braking.
4. Increased software complexity
With the development of technologies such as electrification, intelligence, and networking, the electronic and electrical architecture of autonomous vehicles has become more complex and will also face many problems, such as the increase in ECUs and big data, the higher complexity of the human-computer interface, the frequent hacking of connected cars, and the satisfaction of the differentiated needs of autonomous driving customers... It is understood that L5 autonomous driving vehicles are expected to require 1 billion lines of code, compared with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, which requires only 14 million lines of code.
Therefore, the importance of software function virtualization and hardware simplification will be further enhanced, and this may become a reality in several forms. One is to integrate hardware into stacks for different latency and reliability requirements; the second is that a redundant "supercomputer" will replace the ECU; the third is to completely abandon the concept of control units and adopt intelligent node computing networks instead.
5 How to improve the acceptance of autonomous driving deployment
According to the latest data from the American Automobile Association (AAA), 73% of American drivers say they are afraid to ride in a fully autonomous car, and 63% of American adults believe it is unsafe to share the road with an autonomous car while walking or riding a bicycle. Only when drivers and passengers believe that safety is trustworthy enough will the public accept new advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and increasingly automated technologies.
Safety is a key guarantee for automotive electronic systems, and strict safety standards and certifications apply to anything that needs to maintain reliable performance when the driver demands it, such as braking, steering, etc. When we improve the autonomous decision-making of cars, we are essentially replacing human safety decisions with complex computer systems.
6 From prototype to mass production
当今自主决策计算系统原型通常是基于现有的服务器技术,其挑战在于尺寸、功耗和散热性不适合于汽车。所有这些特性都需要显著减少,人们普遍认为功耗需要减少10倍,尺寸需要减少5倍,如果两者都能实现,那么成本和散热将显著降低。这也将推动自动驾驶汽车在消费者领域和机器人出租车领域的真正部署。
7. Enhance the in-car passenger connectivity experience
For the terminal field, the V2X communication module that supports autonomous driving is used as the entry point to further integrate various functional modules in the car, including in-car computing, storage and other functions, to build a new in-vehicle electronics business field, which can also be said to be the business scope of chip companies. Creating higher-performance and safer connected cars, realizing autonomous driving faster, providing better in-car passenger interconnection experience, and becoming a software and hardware platform for managing in-car applications are the differentiated competitive advantages of car manufacturers.
How can Arm help overcome these challenges?
Automotive OEMs and Tier-1 manufacturers are increasingly aware of the need for a strong technology partner to help them solve these challenges, and they have unanimously identified Arm and its extensive automotive ecosystem as the right partner to achieve this goal. In fact, Arm has been working closely with the automotive industry to understand each of the above challenges and provide complete solutions to help large-scale deployment of autonomous driving.
1. Comprehensive coverage of computing needs
Arm CPUs and other IPs such as GPUs, ISPs, and NPUs allow Arm-based solutions to be used in various systems throughout the vehicle, and Arm's partners also offer the widest range of automotive-grade SoCs. This series of application processors (Cortex-A), real-time processors (Cortex-R), and small, low-power microprocessors (Cortex-M) are suitable for all stages of autonomous driving. As Arm's partners bring more computing power to heterogeneous SoC platforms, this will help meet greater computing power needs while reducing power consumption, price, size, and maintaining good heat dissipation characteristics.
2 Achieving “Safety Readiness” for Higher Levels of Automated Driving
The Safety Ready program includes Arm's existing safety products as well as new or future products, which are developed using rigorous functional safety processes, including system processes and development that support ISO 26262 and IEC 61508 standards. The Safety Ready program provides a one-stop software, tools, components, certifications, and standards to simplify and reduce the cost of integrating functional safety for Arm partners. With the Safety Ready program, partners and automotive OEMs can ensure that their SoCs and systems have the highest level of functional safety required for autonomous driving applications.
3. Performance and safety are both indispensable
Arm’s leadership in security does not stop at integrating the latest certifications and standards. Although the Split-Lock feature is not new to the industry, Arm is the first to introduce it to processors designed for high-performance automotive applications. Split-Lock technology is a disruptive security innovation that enables the following performance:
Provides flexibility not previously possible with lock-step CPU deployments
The CPU cluster in the SoC can be configured in “split-core mode” to achieve high performance, where two (or four) independent CPUs in the cluster can be used for various tasks and applications
If configured in "Lockstep Mode", the CPUs will be in lockstep, creating a pair (or two pairs) of locked CPUs in the cluster for higher automotive safety integrity applications
CPU clusters can be configured to run in either mode after silicon production
4 New “Automotive Enhanced” Products
In September 2018, Arm launched the first autonomous driving processor Cortex-A76AE with integrated functional safety, designed specifically for the automotive industry. The chip is equipped with Split-Lock technology, a disruptive safety innovation that has been implemented in an application processor for the first time.
However, for autonomous driving, the amount of real-time data collected and processed is much greater than that of ADAS. Therefore, in December 2018, Arm launched another IP for high data throughput computing, the Cortex-A65AE, which is aimed at the automotive electronics market and is mainly optimized for 7nm. Its biggest feature is that it supports SMT multithreading, and its performance throughput is 3.5 times higher than that of the previous generation. It is expected to be launched in 2020. At the same time, car companies may be willing to use the two chips, Cortex-A76AE and Cortex-A65AE, in combination to complete the perception process.
5. The broadest ecosystem advantage
As we all know, Arm is the IP supplier behind the chip. Currently, Arm has more than 1,500 IP licenses worldwide, and the shipment of chips based on the Arm architecture has reached 125 billion pieces. In 2017 alone, the shipment of chips based on the Arm architecture exceeded 21 billion pieces. Authorized partners include more than 500 industry leaders, startups, chip companies and OEM manufacturers. In addition, 16 top automotive chip manufacturers have authorized Arm's IP.
Previous article:Everyone is working on fuel cells, but who really understands the Japanese's black technology?
Next article:ADI builds innovative audio bus that enters 90% of global automobile manufacturers
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- A review of deep learning applications in traffic safety analysis
- Dual Radar: A Dual 4D Radar Multimodal Dataset for Autonomous Driving
- A review of learning-based camera and lidar simulation methods for autonomous driving systems
- Multi-port and shared memory architecture for high-performance ADAS SoCs
- 2024 China Automotive Charging and Battery Swapping Ecosystem Conference held in Taiyuan
- State-owned enterprises team up to invest in solid-state battery giant
- The evolution of electronic and electrical architecture is accelerating
- The first! National Automotive Chip Quality Inspection Center established
- BYD releases self-developed automotive chip using 4nm process, with a running score of up to 1.15 million
- GEODNET launches GEO-PULSE, a car GPS navigation device
- Should Chinese car companies develop their own high-computing chips?
- Infineon and Siemens combine embedded automotive software platform with microcontrollers to provide the necessary functions for next-generation SDVs
- Continental launches invisible biometric sensor display to monitor passengers' vital signs
- Intel promotes AI with multi-dimensional efforts in technology, application, and ecology
- ChinaJoy Qualcomm Snapdragon Theme Pavilion takes you to experience the new changes in digital entertainment in the 5G era
- Infineon's latest generation IGBT technology platform enables precise control of speed and position
- Two test methods for LED lighting life
- Don't Let Lightning Induced Surges Scare You
- Application of brushless motor controller ML4425/4426
- Easy identification of LED power supply quality
- World's first integrated photovoltaic solar system completed in Israel
- Sliding window mean filter for avr microcontroller AD conversion
- What does call mean in the detailed explanation of ABB robot programming instructions?
- STMicroelectronics discloses its 2027-2028 financial model and path to achieve its 2030 goals
- 2024 China Automotive Charging and Battery Swapping Ecosystem Conference held in Taiyuan
- State-owned enterprises team up to invest in solid-state battery giant
- The evolution of electronic and electrical architecture is accelerating
- The first! National Automotive Chip Quality Inspection Center established
- BYD releases self-developed automotive chip using 4nm process, with a running score of up to 1.15 million
- GEODNET launches GEO-PULSE, a car GPS navigation device
- Should Chinese car companies develop their own high-computing chips?
- Infineon and Siemens combine embedded automotive software platform with microcontrollers to provide the necessary functions for next-generation SDVs
- Continental launches invisible biometric sensor display to monitor passengers' vital signs
- How to read and write EEPROM contents in PIC16F1938 chip
- STLINK cannot recognize the chip
- LSM6DSL motion sensor angular velocity data fluctuation problem
- Calculation of stack usage in C2000 DSP
- MOS tube-MOS tube short circuit protection circuit and short circuit protection circuit schematic summary
- ZigBee On Windows Mobile--ZigBee Module Antenna Design
- Help, has anyone encountered this problem using the Pickit 3 Programmer programming tool?
- Qorvo Simplifies Smart Home IoT Design with Matter Development Kit
- The time for UWB to explode has arrived!
- The distance between boards cannot be changed during AD puzzle