With the increase in the types of electrical equipment used in modern cars and the increase in power levels, more and more types of power supplies are required, including AC power and DC power. These power supplies all require a switching converter to increase the DC voltage of +12VDC or +24VDC provided by the battery to +220VDC or +240VDC through a DC-DC converter, and then the latter stage is converted into industrial frequency AC power or variable frequency voltage regulating power through a DC-AC converter. For the front-stage DC-DC converter, it includes a high-frequency DC-AC inverter part, a high-frequency transformer and an AC-DC rectifier part. Different combinations are suitable for different output power levels, and the conversion performance is also different. The push-pull inverter circuit has been widely used due to its simple structure and high transformer core utilization, especially in small and medium power applications with low voltage and high current input. At the same time, the full-bridge rectifier circuit also has the characteristics of high voltage utilization and high output power support. Therefore, this paper adopts a push-pull inverter-high-frequency transformer-full-bridge rectifier scheme, designs a DC-DC converter with 24VDC input, 220VDC output, and a rated output power of 600W, and uses the AP method to design the corresponding push-pull transformer.
Working principle of push-pull inverter
Figure 1 shows the basic circuit topology of a push-pull inverter-high-frequency transformer-full-bridge rectifier DC-DC converter. By controlling the two switch tubes S1 and S2 to conduct alternately at the same switching frequency, and the duty cycle d of each switch tube is less than 50%, a certain dead time is reserved to avoid S1 and S2 being turned on at the same time. The input DC low voltage is inverted into AC high-frequency low voltage by the front-stage push-pull inverter, sent to the primary side of the high-frequency transformer, and through transformer coupling, AC high-frequency high voltage is obtained on the secondary side, and then the desired DC high voltage is obtained after full-bridge rectification and filtering composed of reverse fast recovery diodes FRD. Since the minimum reverse voltage that the switch tube can withstand is twice the input voltage, that is, 2UI, and the current is the rated current, the push-pull circuit is generally used in small and medium-power occasions with low input voltage.
Figure 1: Push-pull inverter-high frequency transformer-full bridge rectifier circuit diagram
When S1 is turned on, its drain-source voltage uDS1 is just the conduction voltage drop of a switch tube. Ideally, it can be assumed that uDS1=0. At this time, an induced voltage will be generated in the winding, and according to the same-name terminal relationship of the primary winding of the transformer, the induced voltage will also be superimposed on the turned-off S2, so that the voltage that S2 bears when it is turned off is the sum of the input voltage and the induced voltage, which is about 2UI. In practice, the leakage inductance of the transformer will generate a large spike voltage applied to both ends of S2, causing large turn-off losses. The efficiency of the converter is not very high due to the limitation of the leakage inductance of the transformer. An RC snubber circuit, also called an absorption circuit, is connected between the drains of S1 and S2 to suppress the generation of spike voltages. And in order to provide a feedback loop for energy feedback, a freewheeling diode FWD is connected in anti-parallel at both ends of S1 and S2. Design of switching transformer
The area product (AP) method is used for design. For the push-pull inverter working switching power supply, the primary supply voltage UI=24V, the secondary side is a full-bridge rectifier circuit, the expected output voltage UO=220V, the output current IO=3A, the switching frequency fs=25kHz, the initial transformer efficiency η=0.9, and the working magnetic flux density Bw=0.3T.
(1) Calculate the total apparent power PT. Assume the reverse voltage drop of the fast recovery diode FRD: VDF = 0.6 * 2 = 1.2V
Design of Switching Transformer by AP Method
Analysis of push-pull inverter problems
1. Energy feedback
During the conduction period of the main circuit, the primary current increases with time, and the conduction time is determined by the drive circuit.
Figure 2: Push-pull inverter energy feedback equivalent circuit
Figure 2(a) is an equivalent circuit when S1 is turned on and S2 is turned off. The arrow in the figure indicates the direction of current flow, which flows out from the positive electrode of the power supply UI, flows through S1 into the negative electrode of the power supply UI, that is, the ground. At this time, FWD1 is not turned on; when S1 is turned off, before S2 is turned on, due to the storage of primary energy and leakage inductance, the terminal voltage of S1 will increase, and the terminal voltage of S2 will decrease through transformer coupling. At this time, the energy recovery diode FWD2 connected in parallel with S2 is not turned on, and no current flows in the circuit until an induced voltage with positive voltage on the top and negative voltage on the bottom is generated on the primary winding of the transformer. As shown in Figure 2(b); FWD2 is turned on, and the flyback energy is fed back to the power supply, as shown in Figure 2(c), and the arrow points to the direction of energy feedback.
2. Waveform analysis at each point
When a falling edge of a PWN signal comes, the switch element it controls is turned off. Due to the storage of primary energy and leakage inductance, a surge voltage is generated at the drain, which is greater than 2UI. Because an RC snubber circuit is added, it is finally stabilized near 2UI.
When the falling edge of the PWN signal of S1 comes, S1 is turned off, a high impulse voltage is generated at the drain, and the feedback energy diode FWD2 connected in parallel with S2 is turned on to form an energy feedback loop. At this time, a high impulse current is generated at the drain of S2, as shown in FIG4 .
Figure 5: Push-pull DC-DC converter main circuit diagram
Experiment and analysis
1. Principle design
Figure 5 is a simplified main circuit. The input 24V DC voltage is filtered by a large capacitor and connected to the middle tap of the primary side of the push-pull transformer. The other two taps of the primary side of the transformer are connected to two fully controlled switching devices IGBT, and an RC absorption circuit is added between them to form a push-pull inverter circuit. The output end of the push-pull transformer is rectified by a full bridge and filtered by a large capacitor to obtain a 220V DC voltage. The feedback voltage signal UOUT is obtained through the voltage divider branch.
The control circuit is constructed with the CA3524 chip as the core. The switching frequency of the fully controlled switch device is adjusted by adjusting the resistance and capacitance between pins 6 and 7. Pins 12 and 13 output PWM pulse signals, and through the drive circuit, they control the two fully controlled switch devices alternately. The voltage feedback signal is input to pin 1 of the chip, and the reference voltage of the voltage feedback signal is input to pin 2 by adjusting the potentiometer P2. Together with the COM terminal of pin 9 and the internal operational amplifier of CA3524, a PI regulator is formed to adjust the PWM pulse duty cycle to achieve the purpose of stabilizing the output voltage of 220V.
2. Results and Analysis
The experimental results show that the output voltage is stable at 220V, and the ripple voltage is small. The maximum output power can reach nearly 600W, and the system efficiency is basically stable at 80%, achieving the expected effect. Among them, due to the large efficiency loss of IGBT, the system efficiency is low. If MOSFET with smaller loss is used, the system efficiency will increase by at least 10%~15%.
Note:
(1) When the primary winding of the transformer is excited in the positive and negative directions, the corresponding volt-second products are not equal, which will cause the working magnetization curve of the core to deviate from the origin. This magnetic bias phenomenon is related to the selection of the switch tube because the different reverse recovery times of the switch tube can lead to different volt-second products.
(2) In the experiment, as the input voltage slightly increased, the system loss increased. The main reason is that the transformer core produces large eddy current losses, which reduces the system efficiency. The main measures to reduce eddy current losses are: reducing the induced potential, such as using iron powder core materials; increasing the resistivity of the core, such as using ferrite materials; lengthening the path of the eddy current, such as using silicon steel sheets or amorphous strips.
in conclusion
The push-pull circuit is particularly suitable for low-voltage and high-current input of small and medium power occasions, and a high-frequency push -pull transformer is designed using the AP method. The experimental results show that the push-pull inverter-high-frequency transformer-full-bridge rectifier scheme has achieved the expected effect, making the output voltage stable at 220V and having a certain output hardness, and the efficiency reaches 80%, providing a certain development space for the development of modern automotive power supplies.
Previous article:An inverter regulator that offers more options and reduces complexity
Next article:A distributed inverter power parallel control technology and its implementation
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- MathWorks and NXP Collaborate to Launch Model-Based Design Toolbox for Battery Management Systems
- STMicroelectronics' advanced galvanically isolated gate driver STGAP3S provides flexible protection for IGBTs and SiC MOSFETs
- New diaphragm-free solid-state lithium battery technology is launched: the distance between the positive and negative electrodes is less than 0.000001 meters
- [“Source” Observe the Autumn Series] Application and testing of the next generation of semiconductor gallium oxide device photodetectors
- 采用自主设计封装,绝缘电阻显著提高!ROHM开发出更高电压xEV系统的SiC肖特基势垒二极管
- Will GaN replace SiC? PI's disruptive 1700V InnoMux2 is here to demonstrate
- From Isolation to the Third and a Half Generation: Understanding Naxinwei's Gate Driver IC in One Article
- The appeal of 48 V technology: importance, benefits and key factors in system-level applications
- Important breakthrough in recycling of used lithium-ion batteries
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- CGD and Qorvo to jointly revolutionize motor control solutions
- CGD and Qorvo to jointly revolutionize motor control solutions
- Keysight Technologies FieldFox handheld analyzer with VDI spread spectrum module to achieve millimeter wave analysis function
- Infineon's PASCO2V15 XENSIV PAS CO2 5V Sensor Now Available at Mouser for Accurate CO2 Level Measurement
- Advanced gameplay, Harting takes your PCB board connection to a new level!
- Advanced gameplay, Harting takes your PCB board connection to a new level!
- A new chapter in Great Wall Motors R&D: solid-state battery technology leads the future
- Naxin Micro provides full-scenario GaN driver IC solutions
- Interpreting Huawei’s new solid-state battery patent, will it challenge CATL in 2030?
- Are pure electric/plug-in hybrid vehicles going crazy? A Chinese company has launched the world's first -40℃ dischargeable hybrid battery that is not afraid of cold
- 03. Light up the LED and test the buttons
- 7.4V battery charge management IC?
- TI z-stack's OSAL multi-task scheduling mechanism
- Help
- Sensor question
- [National Technology Low Power Series N32L43x Review] 1. Development Board Unboxing
- TIOBE Index for July 2021
- MOS tube smokes directly
- How to solve the motor efficiency and temperature rise problems caused by motor controllers
- Getting Started with the MSP432P401R Clock