1 Introduction
In recent years, as the input voltage requirements of computer microprocessors are getting lower and lower, the research on low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converters has received attention from many researchers, and various topological structures have emerged in an endless stream. Synchronous rectification technology, multi-phase technology, magnetic integration technology, etc. are also applied to this field. The author proposes a staggered parallel low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converter, which adopts a symmetrical half-bridge structure on the primary side and a current-doubler rectifier structure on the secondary side. This structure can greatly reduce the current ripple on the filter capacitor, thereby greatly reducing the size of the filter inductor and the size of the entire DC-DC converter. This converter operates in an environment with an input voltage of 48 V and a switching frequency of 100 kHz.
Structural analysis of low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converter with 2-fold current rectification
The circuit schematic of the low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converter with 2-fold current rectification is shown in Figure 1. The primary side adopts a symmetrical half-bridge structure, and the secondary side adopts a 2-fold current rectification structure. When S1 is turned on, SR1 must be turned off and L1 is charged; when S2 is turned on, SR2 must be turned off and L2 is charged, so that the filter inductor current will be shifted and superimposed on the filter capacitor. Figure 2 shows the switch control strategy.
Figure 1 Circuit diagram of low voltage and high current DC-DC converter with current doubler rectification
Figure 2 Switch control strategy
From the above analysis, it can be seen that the two filter inductor currents on the secondary side of the current doubler rectifier structure are superimposed on the filter capacitor, so that the output current ripple becomes quite small.
The synchronous rectifiers in the structure are all driven by external signals, which makes the control very complicated. However, it is difficult to use a simple self-driving method in this half-bridge-current doubler topology because, in this structure, if a suitable point is directly taken from the circuit as the driving signal of the synchronous rectifier, when the driving signal is zero during the dead time, the synchronous rectifier will be cut off. In order to use the self-driving method in the half-bridge-current doubler topology, an auxiliary winding must be used.
Taking a single half-bridge current doubler topology as an example, see Figure 3, VSEC is the secondary voltage of the transformer, Vgs is the driving voltage of the synchronous rectifier obtained by the auxiliary winding, it can be seen that even within the dead time, the driving voltage of the synchronous rectifier cannot be zero, which ensures the application of the self-driving method in this topology.
Figure 3 Self-driven synchronous rectifier circuit and waveform
In addition, since the MOSFET conduction voltage drop will increase under high current conditions, resulting in large conduction losses, multiple MOSFETs should be connected in parallel to reduce losses.
3 Interleaved parallel low-voltage high-current DC-DC converter
3.1 Circuit schematic diagram
In summary, the current doubler rectifier low-voltage high-current DC-DC converter has good performance. On this basis, the interleaved parallel technology is introduced to form a new structure, called parallel low-voltage high-current DC-DC converter, which can further reduce the output current ripple.
Figure 4 is a circuit schematic diagram of an interleaved parallel low-voltage high-current DC-DC converter (taking the simplest two current doubler rectifiers interleaved parallel as an example).
Figure 4 Circuit diagram of interleaved low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converters
3.2 Switching control strategy of the converter
The switching control strategy of the interleaved low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converter is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5 Switching control strategy for interleaved low-voltage, high-current DC-DC converters
3.3 Performance of interleaved parallel low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converters
First, the biggest advantage of this topology is that the structure of the primary side of the transformer is simplified, and the control becomes very simple. Secondly, the implementation of this method must use a synchronous rectifier circuit, because the implementation of the interleaved parallel circuit requires that the upper and lower potentials of the secondary side of the transformer are positive in turn, and there is only one positive potential in a period of time, and the rest are zero potential. However, in this topology, since the primary sides of the two transformers are connected in series, and the secondary sides are connected in parallel, if a Schottky diode is used as a rectifier, the input voltage will be divided on the primary sides of the two transformers, and the Schottky diode has no gating function, so the waveform on the secondary side of the transformer will be completely symmetrical, and the currents of the upper and lower rectifier circuits will completely overlap, and the purpose of current interleaved parallel connection cannot be achieved. In this
way, a synchronous rectifier is used to complete this function, and the bidirectional conductive characteristics of MOSFET are used at the same time, because the drain-source current of the synchronous rectifier is distributed on both sides of the horizontal axis of the coordinate. The process of this structure is analyzed in detail as follows:
1) S1 is turned on, S2 is turned off; S3 is turned off, S4, S5, S6 are all turned on. Due to the conduction of S4, S5, S6, the lower end of the secondary winding of the first transformer is at zero potential, the upper and lower ends of the secondary winding of the second transformer are at zero potential, the current on the inductor L1 increases, and the current on L2, L3, L4 decreases.
2) S2 is turned on, S1 is turned off; S4 is turned off, S3, S5, S6 are all turned on. Due to the conduction of S3, S5, S6, the upper end of the secondary winding of the first transformer is at zero potential, the upper and lower ends of the secondary winding of the second transformer are at zero potential, the current on the inductor L2 increases, and the current on L1, L3, L4 decreases.
3) S1 is turned on, S2 is turned off; S5 is turned off, S3, S4, S6 are all turned on. Due to the conduction of S3, S4, and S6, the lower end of the secondary winding of the second transformer is at zero potential, the upper and lower ends of the secondary winding of the first transformer are at zero potential, the current on the inductor L3 increases, and the current on L1, L2, and L4 decreases.
4) S2 is turned on, S1 is turned off; S6 is turned off, and S3, S4, and S5 are all turned on. Due to the conduction of S3, S4, and S5, the upper end of the secondary winding of the second transformer is at zero potential, the upper and lower ends of the secondary winding of the first transformer are at zero potential, the current on the inductor L4 increases, and the current on L1, L2, and L3 decreases.
The above formulas all ignore the voltage drop of the rectifier, and VSEC is the voltage value of the secondary side of the transformer.
According to the above analysis, by applying synchronous rectifiers, this staggered parallel half-bridge-current doubler topology can be realized by connecting the primary side of the transformer in series and the secondary side in parallel. Its advantages are mainly as follows:
1) It effectively simplifies the topology and control strategy.
2) When the frequency remains unchanged, if the peak-to-peak value of the ripple is constant, this structure can effectively reduce the value of the filter inductor, thereby speeding up the dynamic response time of the entire converter. 3)
Compared with the non-interleaved parallel half-bridge-current doubler topology, the conduction loss of the primary and secondary sides of the interleaved parallel half-bridge-current doubler topology is almost the same, but due to the use of interleaved parallel technology, the switching frequency of the secondary side is half of the original, and the corresponding switching loss is also half of the original. Since the switching loss of the converter accounts for a large proportion of the entire loss statistics, the interleaved parallel technology can greatly improve the efficiency of the converter.
4 Simulation Analysis
Pspice software is used to simulate the circuit. The parameters of the circuit are as follows: switching frequency is 100 kHz, duty cycle is 40%, input voltage is 48 V, filter inductance is 2 μH, filter capacitor is 820 μF, output current is 60 A, and output voltage is 1125 V.
Figure 6 shows the current waveform of the filter inductor. It can be seen from Figure 6 that the currents of the four filter inductors are charged in turn. If one filter inductor is charging, the other three inductors must be discharged. During the dead time, the four filter inductors are all discharged.
Figures 7 and 8 show the output current ripple waveforms of the interleaved parallel converter and the single current doubler rectifier converter structure, respectively. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the currents of the four filter inductors are superimposed on the filter capacitor, which can reduce the current ripple a lot.
Figure 6 Filter inductor current waveform
Figure 7 Output current ripple waveform of staggered parallel converter structure
Figure 8 Output current ripple waveform of single current doubler rectifier converter structure
5 Experimental results
Through theoretical research and simulation analysis, it can be seen that the staggered parallel low-voltage high-current DC-DC converter has good performance. When the output is 1125 V/60 A, the output current ripple can be reduced to a very small level. In order to further illustrate the feasibility of this topology, the experimental results are used for verification. The experimental circuit is shown in Figure 4. The experimental parameters are the same as the simulation. Finally, the experimental waveform shown in Figure 9 is obtained. In Figure 9, Vgs is the gate drive voltage waveform of a MOSFET on the primary side, and Vds is the gate-source voltage waveform of the corresponding MOSFET. It can be seen from Figure 9 that the waveform obtained by the experimental results is very consistent with the theoretical analysis results of Figure 5. The proposed method is feasible. Among them, the transformer uses the GU22 core made of R2KB soft ferrite material, and the number of turns of the primary and secondary sides are 8 turns and 1 turn respectively; the inductor uses the ring core T5-10-215 made of wide constant magnetic material IJ 50h, and the number of turns is 8 turns.
Figure 9 Experimental waveform
6 Conclusion
Through simulation and experimental analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: For low-voltage and high-current DC-DC converters, the output current ripple can be further reduced by interleaving in parallel, and the effect is very obvious; or under the same output current ripple, the filter inductance value can be greatly reduced, thereby reducing the size of the entire converter and improving the transient response characteristics of the converter. The case of interleaving in parallel of two current-doubler rectifier structures discussed is also applicable to the case of interleaving in parallel of multiple current-doubler rectifier structures.
Previous article:Simulation Study of Three-Level Buck-Boost Bidirectional Converter
Next article:Harsh environments require high performance power conversion
Recommended ReadingLatest update time:2024-11-16 19:49
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- New Energy Vehicle Detection and Diagnosis Experiment (Edited by Mao Caiyun, Zhou Xien, and Long Jiwen)
- Virtualization Technology Practice Guide - High-efficiency and low-cost solutions for small and medium-sized enterprises (Wang Chunhai)
- Design of an adaptive constant on-time buck DC-DC converter with high efficiency and low power consumption
- Research on design technology of high-efficiency step-up DC-DC converter with wide load range
- MathWorks and NXP Collaborate to Launch Model-Based Design Toolbox for Battery Management Systems
- STMicroelectronics' advanced galvanically isolated gate driver STGAP3S provides flexible protection for IGBTs and SiC MOSFETs
- New diaphragm-free solid-state lithium battery technology is launched: the distance between the positive and negative electrodes is less than 0.000001 meters
- [“Source” Observe the Autumn Series] Application and testing of the next generation of semiconductor gallium oxide device photodetectors
- 采用自主设计封装,绝缘电阻显著提高!ROHM开发出更高电压xEV系统的SiC肖特基势垒二极管
- Will GaN replace SiC? PI's disruptive 1700V InnoMux2 is here to demonstrate
- From Isolation to the Third and a Half Generation: Understanding Naxinwei's Gate Driver IC in One Article
- The appeal of 48 V technology: importance, benefits and key factors in system-level applications
- Important breakthrough in recycling of used lithium-ion batteries
- Innolux's intelligent steer-by-wire solution makes cars smarter and safer
- 8051 MCU - Parity Check
- How to efficiently balance the sensitivity of tactile sensing interfaces
- What should I do if the servo motor shakes? What causes the servo motor to shake quickly?
- 【Brushless Motor】Analysis of three-phase BLDC motor and sharing of two popular development boards
- Midea Industrial Technology's subsidiaries Clou Electronics and Hekang New Energy jointly appeared at the Munich Battery Energy Storage Exhibition and Solar Energy Exhibition
- Guoxin Sichen | Application of ferroelectric memory PB85RS2MC in power battery management, with a capacity of 2M
- Analysis of common faults of frequency converter
- In a head-on competition with Qualcomm, what kind of cockpit products has Intel come up with?
- Dalian Rongke's all-vanadium liquid flow battery energy storage equipment industrialization project has entered the sprint stage before production
- Allegro MicroSystems Introduces Advanced Magnetic and Inductive Position Sensing Solutions at Electronica 2024
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- Power amplifier driving capacitive load case sharing
- Power supply zero and live wire detection
- RSL1 Bluetooth characteristic value reading and writing
- Sapphire on PCB---DFM about optical positioning points
- How to choose between different chips in TI's Sub-1GHz product line?
- Design of optimal horn antenna based on HFSS
- Compilation and use of rocket-chip tool chain
- How to connect several cameras to a 100M switch
- Nvidia is said to acquire Arm for 40 billion pounds. Will the situation of domestic chips get worse?
- Operational issues of XDS100V3.0 emulation motoware built-in project