When a vehicle is involved in a head-on collision, the driver's knees are most likely to be injured or even fractured because the distance between the driver's knees and the bottom of the center console is short. Although models such as Mercedes-Benz GLC, Toyota Lelink, and Porsche Panamera are all equipped with knee airbags as standard, in the current automobile market, most models are still only equipped with driver and co-driver airbags and side airbags.
Recently, a study released by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) in the United States showed that the deployment rate of knee airbags continues to increase. Some people believe that the more airbags a vehicle uses, the higher the safety protection performance for the occupants. However, in some accidents, knee airbags not only fail to reduce the safety risks caused by traffic accidents, but increase the risk of injury to the members.
It is reported that knee airbags are usually installed under the dashboard. When a collision occurs, the airbag will automatically pop out to reduce the damage to the driver's legs, form a collision buffer area, and also help alleviate the impact force on the driver's chest and abdomen. To confirm whether knee airbags can improve vehicle safety, IIHS researchers examined collision test data and relevant information from real accidents.
First, the researchers collected more than 400 frontal crash injury data from the IIHS vehicle rating program to confirm whether vehicles equipped with knee airbags can effectively reduce the degree of knee injuries in the event of a collision. The team then searched for data from crash accident reports in 14 states in the United States and compared the crash data of the same models equipped with knee airbags and those without knee airbags.
In the IIHS driver-side 25% and 40% overlap frontal offset collisions, the knee airbags did not provide significant protection for the test dummies, especially in the 40% overlap frontal offset collision, where the knee airbags had almost no effect in reducing injuries. After analyzing the data from real-world accidents, the knee airbags only reduced the risk of injury by 0.5 percentage points, from 7.9% to 7.4%.
Becky Mueller, a high-precision research engineer at IIHS, pointed out that they have proposed several different design solutions to provide protection for the user's thighs and calves to replace knee airbags. After all, the effectiveness of other solutions is no less than that of knee airbags. Currently, many automakers install knee airbags in order to allow their vehicles to pass the mandatory safety test of "unbelted test dolls" proposed by the US federal government. In the IIHS vehicle rating test, the test dolls are usually fixed to the seats with seat belts.
Previous article:Viziblezone system can detect "hidden pedestrians" 150 meters away to protect pedestrian safety
Next article:Tesla Model 3 crashes and explodes in Moscow
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- A new chapter in Great Wall Motors R&D: solid-state battery technology leads the future
- Naxin Micro provides full-scenario GaN driver IC solutions
- Interpreting Huawei’s new solid-state battery patent, will it challenge CATL in 2030?
- Are pure electric/plug-in hybrid vehicles going crazy? A Chinese company has launched the world's first -40℃ dischargeable hybrid battery that is not afraid of cold
- How much do you know about intelligent driving domain control: low-end and mid-end models are accelerating their introduction, with integrated driving and parking solutions accounting for the majority
- Foresight Launches Six Advanced Stereo Sensor Suite to Revolutionize Industrial and Automotive 3D Perception
- OPTIMA launches new ORANGETOP QH6 lithium battery to adapt to extreme temperature conditions
- Allegro MicroSystems Introduces Advanced Magnetic and Inductive Position Sensing Solutions
- TDK launches second generation 6-axis IMU for automotive safety applications
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- Huawei's Strategic Department Director Gai Gang: The cumulative installed base of open source Euler operating system exceeds 10 million sets
- Download from the Internet--ARM Getting Started Notes
- Learn ARM development(22)
- Learn ARM development(21)
- Learn ARM development(20)
- Learn ARM development(19)
- Learn ARM development(14)
- Learn ARM development(15)
- Analysis of the application of several common contact parts in high-voltage connectors of new energy vehicles
- Wiring harness durability test and contact voltage drop test method
- LM27762 Charge Pump with Integrated Positive and Negative LDO
- Transfer a video "There is a kind of beauty called mathematics"
- Let novices quickly understand Zigbee----Zigbee Overview
- #RecommendChinaCore# Activity sharing summary
- STM32F030 MCU ADC cannot be interrupted after DMA is enabled
- 5 yuan a clamp meter
- Classic foreign power electronics tutorials
- 2.4G antenna design reference on PCB board
- Why do I think Jiali Chuang’s marketing has failed?
- I have some questions about CORTEX-M TARGET DRIVER SETUP.