The 618 shopping festival in the AI big model industry is taking the old path of price war

Latest update time：2024-06-28

Reads：

Whether AI developers are willing or not, the domestic large-scale model industry dominated by Internet companies has returned to the Internet-style "free" logic of ten years ago. The decision-making power of commercialization has shifted - when to kill the chicken and when to "take the eggs" is no longer up to them.

No one expected that the first shot of 618 in 2024 would not be initiated by any of the e-commerce companies "Maogou Pindou", but by a large model manufacturer instead.

Half a month ago, Volcano Engine took the initiative and announced that the price of Doubao's main model in the enterprise market was 0.0008 yuan/thousand tokens, which was 99.3% cheaper than the industry average. A week later, Baidu, Alibaba Cloud, iFlytek and other mainstream domestic large model manufacturers all announced that their main models would be fully free.

Since then, the large-scale model price war with the gimmick of free has formed a domino effect that cannot be "reversed" in the short term.

If we look back at the growth history of Internet sub-sectors, most of the time they experienced growth and subsidy periods in exchange for market size and number of users. When the product ecosystem matures and binds enough users and industrial chains to make a living from it, they will raise prices to complete the harvest. So far, the big model has gone through the first year of birth and compliance, and is entering the second stage characterized by price reduction.

The only difference is that the main targets of the price reduction of large models are still enterprise users and application layer developers. For individual users, except for the upgraded services of some manufacturers that require membership subscription, it is still completely free. In other words, for large models and related products, the commercialization process has not really started for the C-end users they really want to cover.

For most developers, the more intense the price war between manufacturers, the lower the product development costs for them. However, once they become dependent on a certain manufacturer, if the product price increases in the future, it will not only mean extremely high exit costs, but also the possibility of ROI (return on investment) returning to normal may be problematic.

Whether AI developers are willing or not, the domestic large-scale model industry dominated by Internet companies has returned to the Internet-style business logic of ten years ago. The decision-making power of commercialization has shifted - when to kill the chicken and when to "take the eggs" is no longer up to them.

0 1

AI big model, start 618

Of course, the act of offering a “discounted price” for the model calling cost itself is very “Internet”.

The reason is simple. The so-called classical Internet spirit is to break the silos of information, realize its flow, and most of the time, free sharing.

Today, as generative AI becomes increasingly popular, faced with this almost "politically correct" business behavior, as long as one company starts a fight, other manufacturers have no right to avoid the fight to protect themselves.

Li Mingshun, CEO of Xingxing AI, told Lujiu Business Review that once the battle begins, the price war between Internet companies is actually a competition for computing power reserves. Therefore, companies such as Tongyi Big Model, which is owned by Alibaba and has the industry's leading cloud resources and computing power reserves, naturally have the motivation to quickly seize the market by lowering prices. Although companies such as Baidu have passive elements in responding to the challenge, in terms of comprehensive strength, they far exceed small and medium-sized startups and are also quite competitive.

So we can see that the first large-scale model manufacturer to announce a price cut was not Wenxin Yiyan, which has been around the longest, nor Tongyi, which has comprehensive technology, but Doubao, which was launched later and has a relatively small voice under Volcano Engine. The price is 99.3% lower than the market average of its peers, which is enough to make other manufacturers "break through the defense by cutting prices." Tencent and iFlytek are even more thorough, directly choosing to offer both non-permanent and permanent full free services.

Of course, we can also sense this from the development trajectory of the public cloud industry. As the average computing power cost decreases with the increase in the number of users and the scale of cloud servers, the cost of using the cloud will naturally decrease. Furthermore, the cost of calling large models, which is directly linked to the computing power cost, will also decrease with the price.

In the process, the capabilities of domestic large models are also constantly evolving - once they reach a usable state, they can be opened to their direct users at a lower price.

However, this kind of free service usually comes with many restrictions. For example, the products with the largest price cuts by Alibaba and Baidu are their lightweight model versions, which are only suitable for short-term use by small and medium-sized enterprises and developers with low usage frequency, low inference volume, and low task processing volume.

This is also very similar to the discount routine of e-commerce 618 coupons - limiting categories, limiting time periods, and limiting usage. Once small and medium-sized developers who "love to get something for free" choose to switch to the big model, they often enter the script set by the manufacturers.

0 2

“Cheap things are often the most expensive”

As the famous writer Stefan Zweig said, "The gifts bestowed by fate are often secretly marked with a price." If, like what happened with taxis and food delivery in the past, if corporate users and individual application developers choose to "rush mindlessly" into the free big model because of the cost, then at the latest in a few years, they will pay a price far exceeding the monetary cost for the free choice.

Similar behaviors actually began to emerge as early as last year. One manifestation of this is that major model manufacturers have been trying to attract developers into their own developer ecosystems through various developer activities and competitions. The specific method is relatively simple and direct - giving tokens.

The principle is not complicated. For individual developers, they can separate part of their developed products as a demo for the competition. After obtaining the tokens given by the manufacturer, they can conduct several rounds of zero-cost reasoning tests and product tuning. Ultimately, the development cycle of entrepreneurial products is shortened and the success rate is increased - of course, the premise is to access the corresponding manufacturer's large model and its ecosystem.

If we infer from the results of "free price reduction", under the scale effect of public cloud resources and computing power resources, the actual cost of the tokens provided by manufacturers is much lower than the outside world imagines. And what they get is much more than the cost they pay.

First, after developers have called on model capabilities countless times, they have indirectly provided manufacturers with reference tuning ideas and product ideas for their underlying models. In other words, manufacturers provide fuel and developers contribute valuable ideas.

Second, once a startup product is launched and scaled up, it is largely bound to the underlying large model ecosystem used in the early stage, and the subsequent product form will also be deeply coupled with the underlying model. This also leads to extremely high conversion costs and potential operating costs in the later stage.

In addition, today when corporate users choose a manufacturer's big model, it is far more than just a simple model ecosystem. The deeper industry attributes and industrial chain advantages of the Internet manufacturers behind them are also considerations.

For example, if a game manufacturer chooses Tencent's big model, will its game products be recommended first in Tencent's channels? If a fast-moving consumer goods manufacturer uses Doubao, will it gain an advantage in Douyin's e-commerce investment? One certain answer is that if it is used, it is unknown whether it will benefit from it. Once the big model of other industry manufacturers is switched, the possibility of losing this benefit is certain.

Li Mingshun also revealed to Lujiu Business Review that since the genes of each large model manufacturer are different, there will not be many survivors who stand out in the cruel "washing" of price wars. Based on the distribution of industry attributes, after the price war is settled, different types of Internet manufacturers will eventually occupy the C position in different directions, and there is a certain possibility of C-end, B-end, and G-end.

0 3

Going back to the old path of the Internet subsidy war

Since the advent of the mobile Internet era, whether it is e-commerce, travel, or local life, most of them have been unable to leave the stages of project financing and launch - large-scale publicity and promotion - subsidy war - entering the platform monopoly period - harvesting and monetization.

In the short two years since the rise of the domestic large-scale model industry, three-fifths of the above process has been completed. The results of the competition among domestic developers will largely determine the territory and sphere of influence of large-scale model manufacturers.

A product architect from an AI startup told Lujiu Business Review that the current wave of price cuts for large models mainly attracts developers from small and medium-sized enterprises. The cost for these teams to switch to large models is relatively low, and they usually only need to write corresponding API interface programs.

Of course, the "fracture" of prices can attract a large number of free patients to come for "treatment", because they are not short of ideas and abilities, but lack the necessary startup costs and computing power resources.

But this is not the case for larger enterprise users. First of all, in response to the compliance requirements of different businesses, such as user data-sensitive companies such as banks and travel, their model security requirements are usually higher. Therefore, the large models they use are usually deeply customized versions of the model manufacturers. This represents a large number of development teams and operation and maintenance teams, which naturally means extremely high switching costs. Only in some non-core edge businesses will non-self-developed large models be used to explore new products and new models.

Even so, for this type of large-scale developer users, the core demand for large models is far more than just price. What is more important is the generation effect and stability during operation.

The reason is very simple. Although the direct users of these underlying models are B-side enterprise users and developers, and the decision factor for choosing a model may be price, most of these users' products will eventually be aimed at the C-end market.

The only driving force for C-end users to use AI products is the generated effect, which is usually referred to as "easy to use". Under the reverse "PUA" of users, companies will also tend to favor this standard.

Under the dual pressure of team operation and maintenance costs and model switching costs, price will not be the only factor in switching models. If you rashly switch the model ecosystem simply because of price, you will pay a heavier price than the price.

- END -

This article is reprinted from " Lujiu Business Review ". The content is the author's independent opinion and does not represent the position of Global IoT Observation. It is for communication and learning purposes only. If you have any questions, please contact us at info@gsi24.com.