860 views|11 replies

15

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

The importance of some components in switching power supplies [Copy link]

 
 

I was recently exhausted by the CE and EFT of a project. I have worked on several projects with power adapters, but I have never encountered such a problem. I suspect that the power supply itself does not suppress interference well. After disassembling the power supply, I found that there is no X capacitor or common mode inductor at the AC input of the power adapter. Some even do not have a π-type filter at the output. I wonder if this is all due to cost? In addition, it is understood that the electronic load of such adapters is basically in constant current mode during factory testing, and the dynamic load is not tested. How can we ensure that the situation is consistent when the dynamic load suddenly changes?

The components saved on the switching power supply still have to be added to the subsequent products. Is this approach really scientific?

sps.jpg (100.82 KB, downloads: 0)

sps.jpg

Latest reply

I'll take a look if I get a chance to take it apart.   Details Published on 2024-3-13 19:19
 
 

1

Posts

0

Resources
2
 

Cost


 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
3
 

I think it is to control costs so that they can outperform their peers. As for the subsequent products, whether they have protection or not, I guess the power adapter manufacturers will not consider it.

 
 
 

52

Posts

2

Resources
4
 

The first reason may be cost; it seems that this is a product of a small factory, and the engineers do not have the knowledge of safety regulations, EMC, loop stability, dynamic response, and design awareness, not to mention the various protection circuit designs.


 
 
 

2w

Posts

341

Resources
5
 

The left side is needed to obtain certification.

The actual product on the right is installed.

Many small manufacturers do this

 
 
 

1w

Posts

204

Resources
6
 

So I always feel that the current products are not as solid as the old ones. Maybe it is because of these reasons. I think it is mainly to save costs, so everything that can be saved and will not cause problems in the short term is saved, and only the components that must be required to achieve the necessary functions are retained.

Add and join groups EEWorld service account EEWorld subscription account Automotive development circle
Personal signature

玩板看这里:

http://en.eeworld.com/bbs/elecplay.html

EEWorld测评频道众多好板等你来玩,还可以来频道许愿树许愿说说你想要玩的板子,我们都在努力为大家实现!

 
 
 

15

Posts

0

Resources
7
 

If some companies' products do not come with a power adapter, but they happen to have a good power adapter that has passed CE and EFT, they can save a lot of magnetic components on the product. If they use this rolled adapter, the cost of the components that need to be added to the subsequent products will not be a small amount for their own company.

 
 
 

820

Posts

2

Resources
8
 

[There is no X capacitor or common mode inductor at the AC input, and some even have no π-type filter at the output]

This is too much water, these are very important things

Comments

Who said filtering is necessary? The low power in the picture can pass the certification without adding it. You can disassemble a 5V1A charger from Apple to see if there are any of the things you said. It is obvious that the author chose a power supply that is not suitable for his application. You can't blame others. Not mentioning the design indicators is just a hooligan.  Details Published on 2024-3-13 18:38
 
 
 

407

Posts

0

Resources
9
 
1nnocent posted on 2024-3-13 16:46 [There is no X capacitor or common mode inductor at the AC input, and some even do not have a π-type filter at the output] This is too much, these are all very important things

Who said filtering is necessary? The low power in the picture can pass the certification without adding it. You can disassemble a 5V1A charger from Apple to see if there are any of the things you said. It is obvious that the author chose a power supply that is not suitable for his application. You can't blame others. Not mentioning the design indicators is just a hooligan.


Comments

[With such a small power as shown in the picture, it can pass the certification without adding any power] I agree.  Details Published on 2024-3-13 19:19
[With such a small power as shown in the picture, it can pass the certification without adding any power] I agree.  Details Published on 2024-3-13 19:01
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
10
 
Bu Yixin posted on 2024-3-13 18:38 Who said that filtering is necessary? With such a low power as the one in the picture, it can pass the certification without adding it. You can disassemble a 5V1A charger that has been passed down from generation to generation to see if it has what you said...

[With such a small power as shown in the picture, it can pass the certification without adding any power]

agree.

 
 
 

820

Posts

2

Resources
11
 
Bu Yixin posted on 2024-3-13 18:38 Who said that filtering is necessary? With such a low power as the one in the picture, it can pass the certification without adding it. You can disassemble a 5V1A charger that has been passed down from generation to generation to see if it has what you said...

I'll take a look if I get a chance to take it apart.

 
 
 

15

Posts

0

Resources
12
 

The answer is basically the same as the previous great god's. Yesterday, I also asked the engineers of the power supply factory, and they replied that due to cost reasons, low-power power supplies below 15W basically do not add this component. As long as the test can pass the power supply standard, it is fine. Today, I took apart an Apple 5V1A charger, as shown in the attached picture, but it still has a common-mode inductor inside.

 
 
 

Guess Your Favourite
Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list