The OP
Published on 2024-8-19 10:53
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Latest reply
After the flyback power supply is started, the control chip is powered by the transformer pin 7/8. At this time, the chip power supply voltage does not need to be 15V, as long as it is higher than 10V (the chip will be shut down if it is lower than 10V). In summary, ZD2 has no effect after startup. I don't know what is the purpose of adding one turn of the winding between pins 7/8. After adding one turn, R95 is necessary, and this resistor will reduce the voltage after D5 rectification. I think R95 does not have the function of limiting the current of ZD2. So there is no need to replace ZD2 with a 20V voltage regulator.
Details
Published on 2024-11-12 17:08
| ||
|
||
2
Published on 2024-8-19 11:11
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
The problem I have now occurred after power failure, not during the startup phase. This chip is basically powered by AC rectifiers, then stepped down through several resistors and then supplied to the VCC pin for pre-startup. After the chip is working, it outputs a PWM waveform, which is then powered by pins 7 and 8 of the transformer.
Details
Published on 2024-8-19 11:14
| ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2024-8-19 11:12
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
It seems that it is known. Then, let's talk about the waveform in the third picture of this post in detail. Wait for me to draw the time in the third picture.
Details
Published on 2024-8-19 17:01
It seems that it is known. Then, let's talk about the waveform in the third picture of this post in detail. Wait for me to draw the time in the third picture.
Details
Published on 2024-8-19 16:58
It seems that it is known. Then, let's talk about the waveform in the third picture of this post in detail. Wait for me to draw the time in the third picture.
Details
Published on 2024-8-19 16:32
It seems that it is known. Then, let's talk about the waveform in the third picture of this post in detail. Wait for me to draw the time in the third picture.
Details
Published on 2024-8-19 16:14
| ||
|
||
|
5
Published on 2024-8-19 11:20
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
[attachimg]861195[/attachimg] Teacher, is the resistor R95 (20R) here a current limiting resistor for the voltage regulator ZD2? Or does it have other functions? Another question, I increased the number of turns of the auxiliary winding of the (7,8) pin by one turn, and theoretically the voltage should also increase by a few volts. The previous design
Details
Published on 2024-11-12 15:52
| ||
|
||
|
6
Published on 2024-8-19 11:54
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
8
Published on 2024-8-19 15:53
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
9
Published on 2024-8-19 16:14
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
10
Published on 2024-8-19 16:32
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
Yes, teacher, I changed the starting resistors R26, R91 and other four resistors from 75K to 100K, and the capacitance of C40 from 47uF to 100uF, and there is no such problem. I think it is caused by increasing the starting capacitor capacity and slowing down the charging current speed. However, a new problem arises that the chip will occasionally be
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 09:50
| ||
|
||
|
11
Published on 2024-8-19 16:58
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
OK, I understand the process and reasons. Let me explain again. I powered on the power supply from t1 to t3, and the power supply was turned off from t4 to t6. The power supply was running in the middle, and it was not turned off at the beginning of t1. Is there any solution for this residual voltage to continue charging the capacitor?
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 09:03
| ||
|
||
|
12
Published on 2024-8-19 17:01
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
[Can I change the resistance of the four balancing resistors R100 and other resistors in parallel of the electrolytic capacitor to be smaller to increase the capacitor discharge speed?] Reducing the four resistors such as R100 will increase the power dissipated by the switching power supply during normal operation, reduce efficiency, and increase heat generation. Therefore, reducing the four resistors such as R100 is not advisable.
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 11:58
[Can I change the resistance of the four balancing resistors R100 and other resistors in parallel of the electrolytic capacitor to be smaller to increase the capacitor discharge speed?] Reducing the four resistors such as R100 will increase the power dissipated by the switching power supply during normal operation, reduce efficiency, and increase heat generation. Therefore, reducing the four resistors such as R100 is not advisable.
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 11:50
[Can I change the resistance of the four balancing resistors R100 and other resistors in parallel of the electrolytic capacitor to be smaller to increase the capacitor discharge speed?] Reducing the four resistors such as R100 will increase the power dissipated by the switching power supply during normal operation, reduce efficiency, and increase heat generation. Therefore, reducing the four resistors such as R100 is not advisable.
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 11:41
[Can I change the resistance of the four balancing resistors R100 and other resistors in parallel of the electrolytic capacitor to be smaller to increase the capacitor discharge speed?] Reducing the four resistors such as R100 will increase the power dissipated by the switching power supply during normal operation, reduce efficiency, and increase heat generation. Therefore, reducing the four resistors such as R100 is not advisable.
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 11:36
[Can I change the resistance of the four balancing resistors R100 and other resistors in parallel of the electrolytic capacitor to be smaller to increase the capacitor discharge speed?] Reducing the four resistors such as R100 will increase the power dissipated by the switching power supply during normal operation, reduce efficiency, and increase heat generation. Therefore, reducing the four resistors such as R100 is not advisable.
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 11:15
| ||
|
||
|
15
Published on 2024-10-12 11:15
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
16
Published on 2024-10-12 11:36
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
Teacher, I have a question about the C40 capacitor. The chip manual says the minimum operating voltage is about 15V. My circuit doesn't have a resistor. How can I ensure that when the power is turned on, the C40 can be charged to 15~16V through the startup resistor? Is it the 18V voltage regulator? Or is it possible that the capacitor value is too small?
Details
Published on 2024-10-12 12:26
| ||
|
||
|
17
Published on 2024-10-12 11:41
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
18
Published on 2024-10-12 11:50
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
19
Published on 2024-10-12 11:58
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
Is there a best of both worlds solution, such as reducing the capacitance of C22 and C23?
Details
Published on 2024-10-15 16:50
Is there a best of both worlds solution, such as reducing the capacitance of C22 and C23?
Details
Published on 2024-10-14 18:01
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190