The OP
Published on 2022-10-2 18:13
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Latest reply | ||
|
||
2
Published on 2022-10-2 18:27
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2022-10-2 18:28
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
4
Published on 2022-10-2 18:29
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
For example, if the voltage I input before is 5V, which is a 0 to 5V PWM square wave, then the time for the voltage to go from 0 to 5V should be about 5 times the time constant, which is about 0.1s. I want to use this resistor and capacitor to make the voltage into a smooth DC. Are 10K and 2.2μF suitable? I simulated it.
Details
Published on 2022-10-2 20:57
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
"For example, if the voltage I input earlier is 5V, and it is a 0 to 5V PWM square wave, then the time for the voltage to go from 0 to 5V should be about 5 times the time constant, which is about 0.1s." As you said, the duration of the high level of your PWM square wave must be more than 0.1s to make the voltage across the capacitor rise.
Details
Published on 2022-10-2 21:19
"For example, if the voltage I input earlier is 5V, and it is a 0 to 5V PWM square wave, then the time for the voltage to go from 0 to 5V should be about 5 times the time constant, which is about 0.1s." As you said, the duration of the high level of your PWM square wave must be more than 0.1s to make the voltage across the capacitor rise.
Details
Published on 2022-10-2 21:17
| ||
|
||
|
6
Published on 2022-10-2 21:17
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
7
Published on 2022-10-2 21:19
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
"Doesn't it say above that the high level duration must be more than 0.1s? If the PWM frequency is 1KHZ, one cycle is only 0.001s, so the high level time must be less than 0.1s, right?" "The high level duration must be more than 0.1s". That's what you said, not me.
Details
Published on 2022-10-5 11:37
"Doesn't it say above that the high level duration must be more than 0.1s? If the PWM frequency is 1KHZ, one cycle is only 0.001s, so the high level time must be less than 0.1s, right?" "The high level duration must be more than 0.1s". That's what you said, not me.
Details
Published on 2022-10-3 08:09
"Doesn't it say above that the high level duration must be more than 0.1s? If the PWM frequency is 1KHZ, one cycle is only 0.001s, so the high level time must be less than 0.1s, right?" "The high level duration must be more than 0.1s". That's what you said, not me.
Details
Published on 2022-10-3 08:07
| ||
|
||
|
9
Published on 2022-10-3 08:07
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
10
Published on 2022-10-3 08:09
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
Honghuzaitian
Currently offline
|
11
Published on 2022-10-5 00:31
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| |
|
||
|
12
Published on 2022-10-5 11:37
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
Comments
On the contrary. The RC low-pass filter should make the RC time constant much longer than the PWM cycle. In your words, the PWM high-level time and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor. Obviously, the high-level and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor, so the capacitor can only be charged a little.
Details
Published on 2022-10-7 21:15
On the contrary. The RC low-pass filter should make the RC time constant much longer than the PWM cycle. In your words, the PWM high-level time and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor. Obviously, the high-level and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor, so the capacitor can only be charged a little.
Details
Published on 2022-10-7 21:14
On the contrary. The RC low-pass filter should make the RC time constant much longer than the PWM cycle. In your words, the PWM high-level time and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor. Obviously, the high-level and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor, so the capacitor can only be charged a little.
Details
Published on 2022-10-7 18:51
On the contrary. The RC low-pass filter should make the RC time constant much longer than the PWM cycle. In your words, the PWM high-level time and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor. Obviously, the high-level and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor, so the capacitor can only be charged a little.
Details
Published on 2022-10-7 18:47
On the contrary. The RC low-pass filter should make the RC time constant much longer than the PWM cycle. In your words, the PWM high-level time and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor. Obviously, the high-level and low-level time are much shorter than the charging and discharging time of the capacitor through the resistor, so the capacitor can only be charged a little.
Details
Published on 2022-10-7 18:39
| ||
|
||
|
14
Published on 2022-10-7 18:29
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
15
Published on 2022-10-7 18:39
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
16
Published on 2022-10-7 18:47
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
17
Published on 2022-10-7 18:51
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
18
Published on 2022-10-7 21:14
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
19
Published on 2022-10-7 21:15
Only look at the author
This post is from Switching Power Supply Study Group
| ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190