6994 views|20 replies
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
The OP
Published on 2018-12-11 11:10
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Latest reply | |
|
||
2
Published on 2018-12-11 12:00
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
For example
Details
Published on 2018-12-11 16:59
| ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2018-12-11 12:02
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The amplitude of the signal is reduced relative to other frequencies. -----------------If it is better if it is not reduced? Why not directly------This concave will reduce the amplitude of the signal at this frequency
Details
Published on 2018-12-11 17:01
| ||
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
| |
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The amplitude of the signal is reduced relative to other frequencies. -----------------Is it better if it is not reduced? Yes. It is usually always hoped that the gain does not change with frequency within the passband.
Details
Published on 2018-12-11 18:27
| |
|
||
|
6
Published on 2018-12-11 18:24
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
7
Published on 2018-12-11 18:25
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
What does this mean?
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 08:53
| ||
|
||
|
8
Published on 2018-12-11 18:27
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
-6dB/octave means 6dB attenuation per octave. Taking a first-order RC low-pass as an example, when the frequency is greater than the corner frequency 1/(2π*RC), the gain is proportional to 1/f (f: frequency). The attenuation value of frequency f1 and 2*f1 = 20*log(1/2f1)-20*log(1/f1) = 20*log(0.5) = -6dB (2) The concave is at that frequency.
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 13:55
| ||
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The first circuit is the frequency divider circuit of the audio amplifier. Its function is to divide the audio signal containing many frequency components into two paths (one is a relatively high frequency component, and the other is a relatively low frequency component), amplify the two paths separately, and then drive the tweeter and woofer respectively. We always hope that the original
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 09:29
| |
|
||
|
10
Published on 2018-12-13 09:29
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Can any audio signal be amplified at the same factor?
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 13:51
Can any audio signal be amplified at the same factor?
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 13:50
| ||
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Can any audio signal be amplified at the same multiple? Is this possible? Yes. For ordinary oscilloscopes, the frequency range of the Y-axis amplifier is usually required to be from zero (in fact, there is no zero frequency, usually the zero frequency is just arbitrarily low, such as 0.0001Hz) to tens of MHz, far beyond the audio range (20Hz ~ 20kHz).
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 15:28
| |
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | |
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Is this right? Yes. But to be clear: the amplitude-frequency characteristic of a first-order RC low-pass filter is 3db attenuation at the "corner frequency". The first picture you posted shows two filter circuits, a high-pass filter and a low-pass filter. Both filter circuits are second-order (two first-order filters in series).
Details
Published on 2018-12-13 15:33
| |
|
||
|
14
Published on 2018-12-13 15:24
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
15
Published on 2018-12-13 15:28
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The X-axis is time, right?
Details
Published on 2018-12-14 11:02
| ||
|
||
|
16
Published on 2018-12-13 15:33
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Should we use 1/2π*RC or 159/RC to calculate the frequency?
Details
Published on 2018-12-14 11:02
| ||
|
||
|
17
Published on 2018-12-13 18:03
Only look at the author
| |
|
|
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | |
|
||
|
QWE4562009
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | |
|
||
|
20
Published on 2018-12-14 11:58
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190