8752 views|16 replies

114

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

USB TYPE C interface problem urgent help [Copy link]

 
I have used USB3300 to drive USB in other products before, and there was no problem. Recently, a project changed the USB interface to TYPE C, rewired, and soldered 3 boards. All of them had the same problem: the USB port connected to the computer was basically not recognized, but occasionally it could be recognized. In addition to the wiring problem, I would like to ask if there are any experts who have used TYPE C and see if there is any problem with the circuit in the figure below (DP pull-up resistor is just a backup)? Especially in terms of TYPE C interface:



This post is from Analog electronics

Latest reply

The moderator explained it well  Details Published on 2019-1-18 23:00

1w

Posts

25

Resources
2
 
The picture is not clear, but it looks like A5 and B5 are left floating. Here we need to set the resistor to identify the power supply.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Doesn't TYPE C only connect VBUS GND DM DP?  Details Published on 2018-11-16 21:42
Doesn't TYPE C only connect VBUS GND DM DP?  Details Published on 2018-11-16 21:42
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
3
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-16 21:27 The picture is not clear, but it looks like A5 and B5 are suspended. Here we need to set resistors to identify the power supply.
Doesn't TYPE C only connect VBUS GND DM DP?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Type C is much more complicated than USB 2.0, especially the power supply part.  Details Published on 2018-11-16 21:57
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
4
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-16 21:27 The picture is not clear, but it looks like A5 and B5 are left hanging. Here we need to set the resistor to identify the power supply.
Aren't there only 4 wires in the TYPE C line?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

The standard type c has 24 wires, half on the front and half on the back. The simplified version has 16 wires. Type c is divided into two parts: communication and power control. I guess you don't use the power part, so you can ignore it. The main thing is communication. DP and DM are the same as before, but it has a voltage recognition function. Only when it is recognized can it pass the USB normally.  Details Published on 2018-11-16 21:55
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
5
 
olive888 posted on 2018-11-16 21:42 Aren't there only 4 wires in the TYPE C cable?
The standard type C has 24 wires, half on the positive and half on the negative. The simplified version has 16 wires. Type C is divided into two parts: communication and power control. I guess you don't use the power part, so you can ignore it. The main thing is communication. DP and DM are the same as before, but it has a voltage recognition function. Only when it is recognized can it normally supply power to the outside through USB. You need to find some information about this part. If there is no special requirement, usually a 5.1K resistor is connected to the ground on A5 and B5.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
6
 
olive888 posted on 2018-11-16 21:42 Doesn't TYPE C only connect VBUS GND DM DP?
Type C is much more complicated than USB 2.0, especially the power supply part.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
7
 
This is part of the circuit I used, for your reference.

This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

This is the TYPE C interface definition I use. What do you think I should do? [attachimg]387687[/attachimg]  Details Published on 2018-11-16 22:16
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
8
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-16 21:58 This is part of the circuit I used, for your reference.
This is the TYPE C interface definition I used, what do you think should be changed?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Refer to the picture above  Details Published on 2018-11-16 23:37
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
9
 
olive888 posted on 2018-11-16 22:16 This is the TYPE C interface definition I use. What do you think should be changed?
Refer to the picture above
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
10
 
DP1 and DP2, DN1 and DN2 are connected together respectively?
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

25

Posts

0

Resources
11
 
It is recommended to check the PCB layout to see if it is differential routing and whether the impedance is matched.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
12
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-16 23:37 Refer to the above figure
As shown in the figure below, if two groups of DM and DN are to be connected, without adding vias, they have to go through a pin next to them (pin 9, the fourth pin from the left, defined as SUB1), and the differential traces are also asymmetrical and of unequal length. I wonder if this kind of trace will work?
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
13
 
The other pins are all useful and cannot be used at will, which will cause many problems. If the requirements are not high, it does not matter if there is no differential line, especially when it is only used as USB2.0.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Thank you! Now I have removed the solder pads and only borrowed them.  Details Published on 2019-1-10 15:38
Thank you! Now I have removed the solder pads and only borrowed them.  Details Published on 2018-11-21 10:47
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
14
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-20 09:42 Other pins are useful and cannot be borrowed at will, which will cause many problems. When the requirements are not high, it doesn’t matter if there is no differential line, especially when it is only...
Thank you! Now I have removed the pads and only borrowed them
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

114

Posts

0

Resources
15
 
dcexpert posted on 2018-11-20 09:42 Other pins are useful and cannot be used at will, which will cause many problems. When the requirements are not high, it doesn’t matter if there is no differential line, especially when it is only...
Redraw the PCB, and now it can be connected to the computer. I found that CC1 and CC2 can be connected without the 5.1K resistor, and they can be connected even when the test software is opened. I don’t know what the difference is between connecting and not connecting?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

It is required in the standard to identify the device and output a certain power. Some chips may not be so strict and can output without it, or the power obtained is relatively small.  Details Published on 2019-1-10 15:41
 
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
16
 
olive888 posted on 2019-1-10 15:38 I re-drew the PCB and now it can be connected to the computer. I found that CC1 and CC2 can be connected without the 5.1K resistor, and they can be connected when the test software is opened...
It is required in the standard to identify the device and output a certain power. Some chips may not be so strict and can output without it, or the power obtained is relatively small.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

321

Posts

1

Resources
17
 
The moderator explained it well
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

Guess Your Favourite
Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list