3242 views|7 replies

2015

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

What is the principle of this power supply rectification method and what are its advantages? [Copy link]

As shown in the figure below, what is the reason for this kind of power supply rectification method and what are its advantages?

This post is from Power technology

Latest reply

Since the impedance of C1C2 is relatively high for the frequency used, the output short-circuit discharge will not cause too much overcurrent on the primary side, that is, peak current limiting protection is not required in this application. Of course, this small current change on the primary side can be used to detect and alarm "there is a mouse", reminding you to deal with the mouse quickly to prevent it from escaping or long-term "short circuit" and affecting the next action.   Details Published on 2022-3-18 11:09
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
2
 

D1~D4 and C1C2 form a typical voltage doubler rectifier circuit. Using two diodes in series may be because the reverse withstand voltage of one diode is not high enough.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
3
 

However, the left side of the transformer is a typical push-pull circuit, which belongs to the forward type. The voltage doubler rectifier may not be very suitable for use in forward switching power supplies.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

3980

Posts

0

Resources
4
 

Fixed ratio non-regulated, no problem! Vicor has many modules with this function. The original side of the original poster's circuit must be added with peak current limiting

This post is from Power technology

Comments

Why is it necessary to add peak current limiting on the primary side?  Details Published on 2022-3-16 17:18
 
 
 

2015

Posts

0

Resources
5
 
PowerAnts posted on 2022-3-16 15:10 Fixed ratio non-regulated, no problem! Vicor has many modules with this function, the original side of the original poster's circuit must be added with peak current limiting

Is it necessary to add peak current limiting on the primary side?

Why?

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

351

Posts

3

Resources
6
 

Isn’t this the circuit of the classic mousetrap grid?

This post is from Power technology

Comments

Can you tell me in detail?  Details Published on 2022-3-17 13:06
 
 
 

1w

Posts

204

Resources
7
 
hjl2832 posted on 2022-3-16 19:25 Isn't this the circuit of the classic mousetrap grid?

Can you tell me in detail?

This post is from Power technology
Add and join groups EEWorld service account EEWorld subscription account Automotive development circle
Personal signature

玩板看这里:

http://en.eeworld.com/bbs/elecplay.html

EEWorld测评频道众多好板等你来玩,还可以来频道许愿树许愿说说你想要玩的板子,我们都在努力为大家实现!

 
 
 

1022

Posts

0

Resources
8
 

Since the impedance of C1C2 is relatively high for the frequency used, the output short-circuit discharge will not cause too much overcurrent on the primary side, that is, peak current limiting protection is not required in this application.

Of course, this small current change on the primary side can be used to detect and alarm "there is a mouse", reminding you to deal with the mouse quickly to prevent it from escaping or long-term "short circuit" and affecting the next action.

This post is from Power technology
Personal signatureچوآن شـين
 
 
 

Guess Your Favourite
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list