The proliferation of ultra-low-power wireless sensor nodes for measurement and control purposes, combined with new energy harvesting technologies, has made it possible to create fully autonomous systems, that is, systems powered by energy from the surrounding environment rather than batteries. Powering wireless sensor nodes with energy from the surrounding environment or "free" energy is attractive because it can supplement battery power or eliminate the need for batteries or wires entirely. This approach has obvious advantages when battery replacement or maintenance is inconvenient, expensive or dangerous.
The complete elimination of wires also makes it easy to massively scale monitoring and control systems. Energy harvesting wireless sensor systems simplify installation and maintenance in areas as diverse as building automation, wireless/automatic metering and predictive maintenance, and countless other industrial, military, automotive and consumer applications. The benefits of energy harvesting are clear, but effective energy harvesting systems require a clever power management approach to convert the extremely small amounts of free energy into a form that can be used by the wireless sensor system.
It all comes down to duty cycle
Many wireless sensor systems consume very low average power, making them prime candidates for energy harvesting. Many sensor nodes are designed to monitor slowly changing physical quantities. Therefore, measurements are not taken and transmitted very often, allowing the system to operate at a very low duty cycle, and accordingly, the average power requirement is also low. For example, if a sensor system requires 3.3V/30mA (100mW) when awake, but is only active for 10ms per second, then the average power required is only 1mW, assuming that the sensor system current drops to a few microamps when not active between bursts of data. If the same wireless sensor samples and transmits only once a minute instead of once a second, the average power drops to less than 20µW. This difference is important because most energy harvesting methods offer very low steady-state power, typically no more than a few milliwatts, and in some cases only a few microwatts. The lower the average power required for an application, the more likely it is to be powered by harvested energy.
Energy harvesting sources
The most common harvestable energy sources are vibration (or motion), light, and heat. Transducers for all of these energy sources have three common characteristics:
1. The electrical output is unstable and is not suitable for directly powering electronic circuits
2. May not provide continuous, uninterrupted power
3. Generally produce very low average output power, usually in the 10µW to 10mW range
If these energy sources are to be used to power wireless sensors or other electronic products, careful power management is required to meet the above requirements.
Power Management: The Missing Link in Energy Harvesting
A typical wireless sensor system powered by harvested energy can be divided into five basic components, as shown in Figure 1. With the exception of the power management component, all of the other components have generally been available for some time. For example, microprocessors that run on milliwatts of power, small and affordable RF transmitters, and transceivers that consume very low power are widely available. Low-power analog and digital sensors are also ubiquitous.
Figure 1: Typical wireless sensor system configuration
SENSORS: Sensors
ENERGY SOURCE (SOLAR, PEIZO, TEG, ETC.): Energy (solar energy, piezoelectric devices, thermoelectric generators, etc.)
POWER/ENERGY MANAGEMENT: Power/Energy Management
uPROCESSOR: Microprocessor
RF LINK:RF link
The missing link in implementing this energy harvesting system link has always been a power converter /power management building block that can operate from one or more common free energy sources. An ideal power management solution for energy harvesting should be small, easy to use, operate well when operating from the unusually high or low voltages generated by common energy harvesting sources, and ideally provide a good load match to the source impedance for optimal power transfer. The power manager itself must consume very little current when managing the accumulated energy and should produce a regulated output voltage using very few discrete components.
Some applications (for example: wireless HVAC sensors or geothermally powered sensors) pose another unique challenge to energy harvesting power converters . Such applications require the energy harvesting power manager to not only operate from very low input voltages, but also to operate from voltages of either polarity as the polarity of the thermoelectric generator (TEG) ∆T changes. This is a very challenging problem, and with voltages in the tens or hundreds of millivolts, a diode bridge rectifier is not a viable option.
The LTC3109, available in a 4mm x 4mm x 0.75mm 20-pin QFN or 20-pin SSOP package, solves the energy harvesting problem from ultra-low input voltage sources of either polarity. The device can operate with input voltages as low as ±30mV, providing a compact, simple, highly integrated single-chip power management solution. This unique capability enables the device to power wireless sensors using TEGs that harvest energy from temperature differences (∆T) as low as 2°C. Using two small (6mm x 6mm), off-the-shelf step-down transformers and a handful of low-cost capacitors, the device provides the regulated output voltages necessary to power today’s wireless sensor electronics.
The LTC3109 uses these step-down transformers and internal MOSFETs to form a resonant oscillator that can operate from very low input voltages. Using a 1:100 transformation ratio, the converter can start up with inputs as low as 30mV, regardless of polarity. The transformer secondary winding feeds a charge pump and rectifier circuit to power the IC (via the VAUX pin) and charge the output capacitor. The 2.2V LDO output is designed to stabilize first to power a low-power microprocessor as quickly as possible. The main output capacitor is then charged to the voltage set by the VS1 and VS2 pins (2.35V, 3.3V, 4.1V or 5.0V) to power sensors, analog circuits, RF transceivers, or even charge supercapacitors or batteries. When the wireless sensor is operating and transmitting data, the VOUT storage capacitor provides bursts of energy during low duty cycle load pulses. In addition, a switching output (VOUT2) is provided to power circuits that do not have a shutdown or low power sleep mode, which can be easily controlled by the host device. A power good output is also included to alert the host device that the main output voltage is approaching its regulated value. Figure 2 shows the circuit schematic of the LTC3109.
Figure 2: LTC3109 schematic for unipolar input operation
TEG (THERMOELECTRIC GENERATOR) ±30mV TO ±500mV
TEG (Thermoelectric Generator): ±30mV to ±500mV
OPTIONAL SWITCHED OUTPUT FOR SENSORS: Optional switch output for sensors
LOW POWER RADIO: Low power radio frequency
SENSOR (S): Sensor
Once VOUT is charged to regulation, the harvested current is diverted to the VSTORE pin to charge an optional large storage capacitor or rechargeable battery. This storage cell can be used to maintain regulation or power the system if the energy harvesting source is intermittent. A shunt regulator on the VAUX pin prevents VSTORE from charging above 5.3V. Using a typical 40mm2 TEG, the LTC3109 can operate with ∆T as low as 2°C, making the device suitable for a wide variety of energy harvesting applications. Larger ∆T enables the LTC3109 to provide higher average output currents. The converter ’s output current vs. VIN curve is shown in Figure 3, which shows that the LTC3109 functions equally well with input voltages of either polarity.
Figure 3: LTC3109 output current versus input voltage
TRANSFORMERS: Transformers
Thermoelectric Generator
A thermoelectric generator (TEG) is a thermoelectric module that uses the Seebeck effect to convert a temperature difference across the device (and the heat flowing through the device due to the temperature difference) into a voltage. The reverse process of this phenomenon (called the Peltier effect) is to generate a temperature difference by applying a voltage and is commonly used by thermoelectric coolers (TECs). The polarity of the output voltage depends on the polarity of the temperature difference across the TEG. If the hot and cold ends of the TEG are reversed, the output voltage will change polarity.
TEG consists of a pair or couple of N-type doped and P-type doped semiconductor chips connected electrically in series and sandwiched between two thermally conductive ceramic plates. The most commonly used semiconductor material is bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3). Figure 4 shows the mechanical construction of TEG.
Figure 4: Typical mechanical structure of TEG
CERAMIC SUBSTRATE: Ceramic Substrate
NEGATIVE -: Negative (-)
CONDUCTOR TABS: Conductor tabs
POSITIVE (+): positive (+)
N-TYPE SEMICONDUCTOR PELLETS: N-type semiconductor chips
P-TYPE SEMICONDUCTOR PELLETS: P-type semiconductor chips
Some manufacturers distinguish TEGs from TECs. When sold as TEGs, it usually means that the solder used to assemble the thermocouples inside the module has a higher melting point, so it can operate at higher temperatures and temperature differentials, thereby providing higher output power than a standard TEC (which is usually limited to a maximum temperature of 125°C). Most low-power energy harvesting applications do not encounter high temperatures or high temperature differentials. TEGs come in a variety of sizes and electrical specifications. The most common modules are square, with lengths ranging from 10mm to 50mm on each side and thicknesses ranging from 2mm to 5mm.
How much voltage a TEG will produce for a given ΔT (proportional to the Seebeck coefficient) is controlled by many variables. Its output voltage is 10mV to 50mV per K of temperature difference (depending on the number of thermocouples) and has a source resistance of 0.5Ω to 10Ω. In general, for a given ΔT, the more series thermocouples a TEG has, the higher its output voltage. However, increasing the number of thermocouples will also increase the series resistance of the TEG, resulting in a larger voltage drop when loaded. Manufacturers can compensate for this by adjusting the size and design of individual semiconductor chips to maintain low resistance while still providing a higher output voltage. The thermal resistance of the TEG is another factor to consider in the process of selecting a TEG and matching it to a heat sink.
Load Matching
To extract maximum power from any voltage source, the load impedance must match the internal resistance of the source. This is illustrated in Figure 5, where a voltage source with an open circuit voltage of 100mV and a source impedance of either 1Ω or 3Ω drives a load resistor.
Figure 5: Simplified schematic of a voltage source driving a resistive load
LOAD OR POWER CONVERTER: Load or power converter
Figure 6 shows the power delivered to the load as a function of the load resistance. In each curve, it can be seen that the power delivered to the load is maximum when the load resistance matches the source resistance.
Figure 6: Power supply output power as a function of load resistance
The LTC3109 presents a minimum input resistance of 2.5Ω to the input supply. (Note that this is the input resistance of the converter , not the input resistance of the IC itself.) This resistance value falls in the middle of the range of most TEG source resistances, providing a good load match for near-optimal power transfer. The LTC3109 is designed so that as VIN decreases, the input resistance increases. This feature allows the LTC3109 to adapt well to TEGs with different source resistances.
Choosing TEG for power generation
Most thermoelectric module manufacturers do not provide data on output voltage or output power versus temperature difference, which is what thermal energy harvester designers want to see. Some other TEG parameters that may be useful are electrical (AC) resistance and thermal resistance. Manufacturers also do not always provide these parameters. Two parameters that are always provided are VMAX and IMAX, which are the maximum operating voltage and maximum operating current of a particular module (when driven by a heating/cooling application). VMAX divided by IMAX will give an approximation of the module's resistance.
If a large amount of heat flux is available, sufficient heat dissipation can be provided on one side of the TEG. A good rule of thumb when selecting a thermoelectric module for power generation is to select the module with the largest product of (VMAX * IMAX) for a given size. This selection generally provides the highest TEG output voltage and the lowest source resistance. One caveat when using this rule of thumb is that the heat sink must be sized to the size of the TEG. Larger TEGs require larger heat sinks for best performance. Note that if resistance is given, it is given as an AC resistance because it cannot be measured using traditional methods with DC current, which would generate a Schiebeck voltage that would result in an erroneous resistance reading. For applications where the available heat flux is limited and/or a smaller heat sink must be used, it is best to select a TEG whose thermal resistance matches the largest available heat sink.
Figure 7 shows the output voltage and maximum output power of a 30mm2 TEG over a ∆T range of 1°C to 20°C. Over this temperature range, the output power varies from hundreds of microwatts to tens of milliwatts. Note that the power curves assume an ideal load match and no conversion losses. Ultimately, after being stepped up to a higher voltage by the LTC3109, the available output power becomes less due to power conversion losses. The LTC3109 datasheet provides several available output power curves for several different operating conditions.
Figure 7: Open circuit voltage and maximum power dissipation using a 30mm2 TEG
OPEN-CIRCUIT: Open circuit
MAX, IDEAL: maximum value, ideal situation
127 COUPLES: 127 couplers
For a given application, the size of the TEG required depends on the minimum available ∆T, the maximum average power required by the load, and the thermal resistance of the heat sink used to keep one side of the TEG at ambient temperature.
Thermal Considerations
When a TEG is placed between two surfaces at different temperatures, the “open circuit” temperature difference before the TEG is added is higher than the temperature difference across the TEG after the TEG is placed. This is because the TEG itself has a fairly low thermal resistance between its two panels (typically 1°C/W to 10°C/W).
For example, consider a large machine operating at a surface temperature of 35°C and an ambient temperature of 25°C. When a TEG is mounted to the machine, a heat sink must be added to the cooler (ambient) side of the TEG, otherwise the entire TEG will heat up to nearly 35°C, eliminating any temperature difference. Remember that output electrical power is generated by the heat flow through the TEG.
In this example, the thermal resistance of the heat sink and the TEG determines how much total ∆T exists across the TEG. A simple thermal model of this system is shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8: Thermal resistance model of TEG and heat sink
AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: ambient temperature
RTHERMAL OF HEATSINK: RTHERMAL OF HEATSINK
RTHERMAL OF TEG: RTHERMAL OF TEG
RTHERMAL OF HEAT SOURCE: RTHERMAL of heat source
HEAT SOURCE: Heat source
Assuming the thermal resistance of the heat source (RS) is negligible, the thermal resistance of the TEG (RTEG) is 6°C/W, and the thermal resistance of the heat sink is 6°C/W, the ∆T across the TEG is only 5°C. Only a very low output voltage can be produced from a TEG with only a few degrees of temperature difference across it, highlighting the importance of the LTC3109’s ability to operate from very low input voltages.
Note that larger TEGs generally have lower thermal resistance than smaller TEGs due to their larger surface area. Therefore, in an application, if a relatively small heat sink is used on one side of the TEG, the ∆T across the larger TEG will be smaller than that of the smaller TEG, and thus may not necessarily provide more output power. In any case, using a heat sink with the lowest thermal resistance will maximize the electrical output by maximizing the temperature difference across the TEG.
For applications where a larger temperature difference (i.e., higher input voltage) is available, a transformer with a smaller turns ratio (e.g., 1:50 or 1:20) can be used to provide a higher output current. As a general rule, if the minimum input voltage is at least 50mV under load, a turns ratio of 1:50 is recommended. If the minimum input voltage is at least 150mV, a turns ratio of 1:20 is recommended.
Ultra-low power applications with battery backup
Some applications run continuously. Such applications are traditionally powered by a small primary battery (e.g., a 3V Li-Ion coin cell). If the power requirements are low enough, such applications can be powered continuously by thermal harvesting, or thermal harvesting can be used to greatly extend battery life, thereby reducing maintenance costs. When all electronics consume less power than the energy harvesting source can provide, the LTC3109 can continuously power the load as long as there is a temperature difference across the TEG. In this case, there is no load on the battery. When the harvested energy is not enough, the backup battery seamlessly steps in and powers the load.
in conclusion
The LTC3109 can uniquely operate with input voltages as low as ±30mV, providing a simple and efficient power management solution that enables wireless sensors and other low power applications to be powered by thermal energy harvesting from common thermoelectric devices. Available in 20-pin QFN or SSOP packages, the LTC3109 offers unprecedented low voltage capability and high integration to minimize solution size. The LTC3109 seamlessly interfaces with existing low power building blocks to support autonomous wireless sensors and extend battery life in critical battery backup applications.
Previous article:Analysis of classic electric vehicle power converter circuit
Next article:Laptop Lithium Battery Charging Control DC/DC Converter Technology
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- MathWorks and NXP Collaborate to Launch Model-Based Design Toolbox for Battery Management Systems
- STMicroelectronics' advanced galvanically isolated gate driver STGAP3S provides flexible protection for IGBTs and SiC MOSFETs
- New diaphragm-free solid-state lithium battery technology is launched: the distance between the positive and negative electrodes is less than 0.000001 meters
- [“Source” Observe the Autumn Series] Application and testing of the next generation of semiconductor gallium oxide device photodetectors
- 采用自主设计封装,绝缘电阻显著提高!ROHM开发出更高电压xEV系统的SiC肖特基势垒二极管
- Will GaN replace SiC? PI's disruptive 1700V InnoMux2 is here to demonstrate
- From Isolation to the Third and a Half Generation: Understanding Naxinwei's Gate Driver IC in One Article
- The appeal of 48 V technology: importance, benefits and key factors in system-level applications
- Important breakthrough in recycling of used lithium-ion batteries
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- Analysis of the application of several common contact parts in high-voltage connectors of new energy vehicles
- Wiring harness durability test and contact voltage drop test method
- From probes to power supplies, Tektronix is leading the way in comprehensive innovation in power electronics testing
- From probes to power supplies, Tektronix is leading the way in comprehensive innovation in power electronics testing
- Sn-doped CuO nanostructure-based ethanol gas sensor for real-time drunk driving detection in vehicles
- Design considerations for automotive battery wiring harness
- Do you know all the various motors commonly used in automotive electronics?
- What are the functions of the Internet of Vehicles? What are the uses and benefits of the Internet of Vehicles?
- Power Inverter - A critical safety system for electric vehicles
- Analysis of the information security mechanism of AUTOSAR, the automotive embedded software framework
- The difference between IAR and Keil development tools
- EEWORLD University Hall ---- Digital VLSI Design Tsinghua University Li Xiangyu
- e-Network 618 mid-year promotion, new customers can save 10% on their first order, and free shipping for orders over 200!
- Analysis of College Students' Electronic Competition Questions - Analysis and Comparison of the 2019 and 2015 National Competition Retest Questions
- Is there any simple way to realize the circuit of charging 12V battery with 36V solar panel?
- Design of temperature measurement system based on msp430 single chip microcomputer
- STM32F103C8T6 minimum system development board connected to 7-pin SPI OLED routine
- DSPF28069 - Interrupt Register Record
- Ping-Pong Operation
- Weekly review information is here~~