4134 views|6 replies

137

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

High-speed wireless debugger: Walls have ears --- wall penetration test [Copy link]

The content of this test is the wall penetration test of the high-speed wireless debugger. We have already tested the distance, anti-interference, and the comparison test with the wired connection. The wall penetration test is almost the last part of the basic test of the high-speed wireless debugger.

Place the high-speed wireless debugger in the bathroom and close the door. The test results may vary depending on the environment, so please refer to the actual situation.

The test method is to use the serial port's self-transmission and self-reception (introduced earlier) to measure the packet loss rate at different baud rates.

Let’s look at 1200bps first.

More than 20,000 bytes of data were not lost. The success rate was 100%. Still good. Here is another dynamic test picture.

Let’s look at 115200bps again.

Again, more than 20,000 bytes of data were not lost. The success rate was 100%. Still good. Here is another dynamic test picture.

The final result is 921600bps.

The result is still that more than 250,000 bytes of data are not lost. The success rate is 100%. Still good. Here is another dynamic test picture.

After three baud rate tests at different speeds, it can be seen that the high-speed wireless debugger has no problem penetrating at least one wall, and the success rate is 100%. It is worth recommending.

In short, the high-speed wireless debugger performs well in terms of stability and speed, and is far ahead in terms of success rate.

There are still a lot of them. You deserve it!

This post is from Embedded System

Latest reply

There are many tricks in debuggers. Never use someone else's debugger. The firmware may be stolen.  Details Published on 2024-7-31 08:55

6555

Posts

0

Resources
2
 

Close the door to test accurately

This post is from Embedded System

Comments

It's almost certain that it can penetrate a wall.  Details Published on 2024-7-29 09:26
 
 

137

Posts

0

Resources
3
 
Jacktang posted on 2024-7-29 08:49 It is more accurate to test with the door closed

It's almost certain that it can penetrate a wall.

This post is from Embedded System
 
 
 

5998

Posts

6

Resources
4
 

I have a question. Is it better to use a gun without a door when testing, especially for large walls with fewer interferences?

This post is from Embedded System
 
Personal signature

在爱好的道路上不断前进,在生活的迷雾中播撒光引

 
 

6062

Posts

4

Resources
5
 

This is good, XX is performing in the front, and the siege lion is tinkering in the back.

This post is from Embedded System

Comments

You know XX  Details Published on 2024-7-29 16:37
 
 
 

137

Posts

0

Resources
6
 
damiaa posted on 2024-7-29 13:57 This is good, XX is performing in the front, and the siege lion is tinkering in the back next door.

You know XX

This post is from Embedded System
 
 
 

7

Posts

0

Resources
7
 
There are many tricks in debuggers. Never use someone else's debugger. The firmware may be stolen.
This post is from Embedded System
 
 
 

Guess Your Favourite
Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews

Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list