4497 views|36 replies

6742

Posts

2

Resources
The OP
 

A large collection of TI M0 official information, a board online, if you want to review it, please give it a thumbs up [Copy link]

 
 This post was last edited by wangerxian on 2023-4-3 16:24

According to TI's official news, TI M0 will release more than 100 MCUs this year . Is this to meet all the engineers' imaginations of M0? This will greatly increase the amount of reusable hardware and code in current and future designs. I heard that TI's MCUs all come with free analog when you buy M0, which is worth looking forward to: including zero-drift operational amplifiers, dual 12-bit 4MSPS ADCs, high-speed comparators, and 12-bit 1MSPS DACs to choose from.

With more than 100 MCU models, it is necessary to have a forum to conduct board evaluation. First, prepare the information and wait for the board online:
MSPM0 L-Series 32-MHz Microcontrollers Technical Reference Manual.pdf (10.11 MB, downloads: 4)
mspm0l1306 datasheet.pdf (2.32 MB, downloads: 7)
MSPM0L1306 LaunchPad Development Kit USerGuide.pdf (2.96 MB, downloads: 4)

I took a look at the SDK, but I won't download it yet because I don't know if there will be any updates. The MSPM0 SDK also comes with IQmath's DSP library, which I heard has a high learning value. I may learn it when the time comes.

By the way, when I checked the development environment, I also saw an important reminder: "Code Composer Studio is transitioning from Eclipse to the Theia application framework." It seems that TI's development environment is also going to change. I look forward to it.

Here are two more official PPTs for you, which are very comprehensive:
TI_FAE_MSPM0 Introduction.pdf (1.98 MB, downloads: 12)
INTRODUCING THE NEW ARM CORTEX- M0+ MCU PORTFOLIO.pdf (1.12 MB, downloads: 9)

I am waiting online for the TI MSPM0 development board. I have a wish and it is estimated that it will be realized soon. Friends who have the same idea can post a comment and support it~

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Latest reply

I don't know if it will be changed in the future. I'm afraid some of them won't be followed up after posting so many at once.  Details Published on 2023-5-13 15:15
 
 

1127

Posts

17

Resources
2
 
TI launched the M0 too late, and I feel that the low power consumption has no advantage at all, and it is not as low as the domestic M0. I use Xiaohua's HC32L136, and it can run at 15uA at 32K. But looking at the TI M0 is simply too scary.
This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

Can HuaDa 32KHz reach 15uA? Where is the report? I'll take a look.  Details Published on 2023-4-3 20:33
Can HuaDa 32KHz reach 15uA? Where is the report? I'll take a look.  Details Published on 2023-4-3 17:10
 
 
 

1127

Posts

17

Resources
3
 

In STOP mode, there is still 45 A at 32 kHz, and Xiaohua's is 15uA when running.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

1127

Posts

17

Resources
4
 

The pin order is pretty neat.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

Haha, yes.  Details Published on 2023-4-3 17:04
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
5
 
fxyc87 posted on 2023-4-3 16:49 The pin order is quite neat.

Haha, yes.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
6
 
fxyc87 posted on 2023-4-3 16:42 TI launched the M0 too late. I feel that the low power consumption has no advantage at all. It is not as low as the domestic M0. I use Xiaohua's HC32L136, and 32K operation can achieve 1 ...

Can HuaDa 32KHz reach 15uA? Where is the report? I'll take a look.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

I measured it, and it is even lower than what is stated in the official documentation. About 8uA  Details Published on 2023-4-4 08:55
 
 
 

210

Posts

3

Resources
7
 

I think it is the prosperity of the domestic ARM market, and TI wants to get a piece of the pie. I hope domestic manufacturers will work hard and not give outsiders a chance.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

5998

Posts

6

Resources
8
 
fxyc87 posted on 2023-4-3 16:42 TI launched the M0 too late. I feel that the low power consumption has no advantage at all. It is not as low as the domestic M0. I use Xiaohua's HC32L136, and 32K operation can achieve 1 ...

You have to have a big move, otherwise you won't have any competitiveness

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

I don't know if I can come up with a big move~  Details Published on 2023-4-4 13:02
Personal signature

在爱好的道路上不断前进,在生活的迷雾中播撒光引

 
 
 

1127

Posts

17

Resources
9
 
wangerxian posted on 2023-4-3 17:10 Can Huada 32KHz reach 15uA? Where is the report? I'll take a look.

I measured it, and it is even lower than what is stated in the official documentation. About 8uA

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

Awesome!  Details Published on 2023-4-4 13:02
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
10
 

TI's products are good, but the ecosystem is too closed

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

It's really good. What do you mean by too closed?  Details Published on 2023-4-4 13:03
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
11
 
Qintianqintian0303 posted on 2023-4-3 20:33 Hold back a big move, otherwise you will not have any competitiveness

I don't know if I can come up with a big move~

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
12
 
fxyc87 posted on 2023-4-4 08:55 I measured it, and it is even lower than the official document. About 8uA

Awesome!

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
13
 
dcexpert posted on 2023-4-4 10:15 TI's products are good, but the ecosystem is too closed

It's really good. What do you mean by too closed?

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

In the past, TI's MCU could only use CCS, and there was basically no third-party software and resources. Unlike other ARMs, there are many options besides Keil.  Details Published on 2023-4-4 14:42
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
14
 
wangerxian posted on 2023-4-4 13:03 It is indeed very good. What do you mean by too closed?

In the past, TI's MCU could only use CCS, and there was basically no third-party software and resources. Unlike other ARMs, there are many options besides Keil.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

IAR can be used, but TI emulators are too expensive, and I couldn't afford them when I was a student.  Details Published on 2023-4-6 13:06
 
 
 

623

Posts

0

Resources
15
 

I think that although TI entered the game late, it must have come well prepared.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

Yes, let the bullets fly for a while.  Details Published on 2023-4-6 09:02
 
 
 

6742

Posts

2

Resources
16
 
jobszheng5 posted on 2023-4-5 15:38 I think TI may seem to be late in entering the game, but it must be well prepared.

Yes, let the bullets fly for a while.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

2624

Posts

6

Resources
17
 
dcexpert published on 2023-4-4 14:42 In the past, TI's MCU could only use CCS, and there was basically no third-party software and resources. Unlike other ARMs, there are many options besides Keil.

Can iar,


The TI emulator is too expensive. I couldn't afford it when I was a student.


This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

ez430 opens the era of low-cost development boards  Details Published on 2023-4-6 15:00
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
18
 
xutong posted on 2023-4-6 13:06 Yes, IAR, TI emulator is too expensive, I couldn't afford it when I was a student

ez430 opens the era of low-cost development boards

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

Sit on a bench and hope for the best.  Details Published on 2023-4-8 12:14
 
 
 

6062

Posts

4

Resources
19
 
dcexpert posted on 2023-4-6 15:00 ez430 opens the era of low-cost development boards

Sit on a bench and hope for the best.

This post is from MSPM0 MCU

Comments

ez430 is a long time ago  Details Published on 2023-4-8 15:02
 
 
 

1w

Posts

25

Resources
20
 
damiaa posted on 2023-4-8 12:14 Take a bench and wait and hope for a better situation.

ez430 is a long time ago

This post is from MSPM0 MCU
 
 
 

Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list