2428 views|1 replies

47

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

[National Technology M4 core hot-selling N32G45XVL evaluation] The fifth low-power performance evaluation [Copy link]

 

Today I spent some time studying the low power mode of N32G45XVL and measured the power consumption data.

First, I summarized the N32G457 low power consumption mode introduced in the manual and listed a table:

model

describe

Power consumption data in the manual

SLEEP

CPU Stop

27mA

STOP0

CPU stopped,

All SRAM and register data are retained,

High frequency clock is turned off,

Main regulator can operate in low power mode

150uA

STOP2

CPU stopped,

Most of the data is lost except for R-SRAM and backup registers

High frequency clock off

Main regulator closed

GPIO is maintained, but the peripheral IO multiplexing function is not maintained

10uA

STANDBY

CPU stopped,

Most data is lost except for the backup registers

High frequency clock off

Main regulator closed

2.7uA

VBAT

VDD power down

2uA

The official manual for SLEEP power consumption data gives data at 105℃, but no data at normal temperature, which is a bit strange.

Then the power consumption was measured using the evaluation board. The measured data is as follows:

ACTIVE: 16mA

SLEEP: 8.1mA

STOP: 65.4uA

STOP2: 2.8uA

STANDBY: 1.65uA

VBAT: 1.7uA

From the test results, the low power consumption performance is still very good, basically better than the data in the manual.

Note that when testing low power consumption current, you need to configure PB4 port as an IO port before testing, because PB4 on the board is connected to an LED.

The default setting of PB4 is JNTRST when it is powered on, which is the input pull-up mode. If it is not configured as IO, there will be leakage.

When I started testing, I found that the power consumption data was too high. It took me a while to find this problem.

This post is from Domestic Chip Exchange

Latest reply

It is best to report your test environment, such as the temperature at the time, the test tools, and whether the tools have been calibrated. It would be even better if you also post pictures.  Details Published on 2022-2-27 09:44
 
 

6818

Posts

11

Resources
2
 
It is best to report your test environment, such as the temperature at the time, the test tools, and whether the tools have been calibrated. It would be even better if you also post pictures.
This post is from Domestic Chip Exchange
 
 
 

Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list