The OP
Published on 2020-3-17 22:30
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Latest reply
This circuit is a bit weird. If you ignore the parameters of the resistors and capacitors, it is a multi-feedback low-pass filter just from the circuit form. However, the capacitance of the two capacitors (one is C96, the other is C91 in series with C93) is too different. The capacitance of C96 is too small, and some distributed capacitances may have the same order of magnitude; the capacitance of C91 in series with C93 is too large, and usually active filters do not use electrolytic capacitors because their capacitance and Q value are very unstable. So it is hard to say.
Details
Published on 2020-3-21 21:16
| ||
|
||
2
Published on 2020-3-18 12:04
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2020-3-18 12:27
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
4
Published on 2020-3-18 14:11
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The capacitance of non-polar capacitors cannot be made large. If 100uF is used in the circuit, only polarized ones can be selected. Using two, connected in positive and negative phases, should be to eliminate the influence of the polarity of the capacitor.
Details
Published on 2020-3-19 19:42
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Q5 is used as a follower only in the negative half cycle of the output, and D17 is turned on in the positive half cycle of the output. Therefore, the load carrying capacity of the positive and negative eight cycles of this multi-channel output is different. I don't know why it is designed like this.
Details
Published on 2020-3-19 09:33
Q5 is used as a follower only in the negative half cycle of the output, and D17 is turned on in the positive half cycle of the output. Therefore, the load carrying capacity of the positive and negative eight cycles of this multi-channel output is different. I don't know why it is designed like this.
Details
Published on 2020-3-19 09:24
| ||
|
||
|
8
Published on 2020-3-19 09:24
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
9
Published on 2020-3-19 09:33
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Hello, what is the function of C96 in the figure? Is it the resistor connected in parallel with the feedback resistor to eliminate high-frequency self-excitation and phase compensation? Thank you!
Details
Published on 2020-3-19 21:05
| ||
|
||
|
10
Published on 2020-3-19 19:42
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
xiaxingxing
Currently offline
|
11
Published on 2020-3-19 21:05
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
This circuit is a bit strange. If you ignore the parameters of the resistors and capacitors, it is a multi-feedback low-pass filter just from the circuit form. However, the capacitance of the two capacitors (one is C96, the other is C91 in series with C93) is too different. The capacitance of C96 is too small, and some distributed capacitance may have some difference.
Details
Published on 2020-3-21 21:16
| |
|
||
|
12
Published on 2020-3-21 21:16
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190