2341 views|5 replies

12

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

Three-phase PFC, current loop does not converge using VIENNA topology [Copy link]

The three-phase PFC adopts the VIENNA topology and samples the DQ rotating vector. However, the process is complicated and the simulation and debugging have been done for a long time. The current loop has no effect and the current cannot be sinusoidal.

I don't understand the meaning of the two PI modules, ID and IQ, in the current inner loop, and how these two modules can achieve the purpose of controlling ID and IQ. The IQ PI loop seen in the closed-loop simulation is always in a divergent and non-convergent state, and the ID PI loop is also in a state of frequent oscillation. However, modifying the parameters of one PI loop alone will affect the waveform of the other PI loop at the same time.

Can anyone who has done this program tell me what causes this phenomenon?

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal

Latest reply

"Modifying the parameters of one PI loop alone will affect the waveform of another PI loop at the same time." "Is it not possible to make the ID loop control the ID current and the IQ loop control the IQ current?" No decoupling?   Details Published on 2019-11-20 09:52

12

Posts

0

Resources
2
 

Figure 1 below shows the PI loop waveform of ID, and Figure 2 below shows the PI loop waveform of IQ

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal
 
 
 

12

Posts

0

Resources
3
 

Three-level space vector pulse width control method. The current waveforms obtained by current simulation are all messy. For the two current PI loops, it seems that the ID loop cannot control the ID current and the IQ loop cannot control the IQ current. How to adjust the PI parameters of these two loops?

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal
 
 
 

85

Posts

0

Resources
4
 

"Modifying the parameters of one PI loop alone will affect the waveform of another PI loop at the same time."

"Is it not possible to make the ID loop control the ID current and the IQ loop control the IQ current?"

No decoupling?

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal

Comments

It has been decoupled, so the formula should be correct. I don't know if there is a problem with the formula for VIENNA to calculate the vector to output PWM waveform or where the problem is.  Details Published on 2019-11-25 20:16
 
 
 

12

Posts

0

Resources
5
 
szc5b posted on 2019-11-20 09:52 "Modifying the parameters of one PI ring alone will affect the waveform of another PI ring at the same time." "It is impossible to control the ID ring with the ID ring ...

It has been decoupled, so the formula should be correct. I don't know if there is a problem with the formula for VIENNA to calculate the vector to output PWM waveform or where the problem is.

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal

Comments

No one has responded to this question. Is it because the number of people working on this area is relatively small? I have just started researching this area. Please guide me.  Details Published on 2020-4-13 13:48
 
 
 

12

Posts

0

Resources
6
 
tianya3089 posted on 2019-11-25 20:16 After decoupling, the formula should be correct. I don't know if there is a problem with the formula from VIENNA calculating the vector to outputting the PWM waveform or where the problem lies

No one has responded to this question. Is it because the number of people working on this area is relatively small? I have just started researching this area. Please guide me.

This post is from Analogue and Mixed Signal
 
 
 

Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list