7948 views|37 replies

887

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

LC filter circuit parameter design verification [Copy link]

 
Design and select LC filter circuit for Class D power amplifier chip output. Now we know that the bandwidth of audio analog signal is 100Hz-16kHz, and the minimum load of load speaker is 2 ohms (now calculated as 2 ohms) My output topology is as shown in Figure 1 Figure 1 Now calculate L=15uH, C=10uF [1] But according to the formula f=1/2*pi*root LC, the cutoff frequency is calculated to be 13kHz, not 16kHz. Do we need to reselect the value of LC? [2] Since the channel power is 40W and the effective value of analog audio signal is 8V, the current of inductor L is 5A. So when selecting L, how large should the selected inductor current be? In addition to considering the volume and cost of the inductor, do we need to look at the ripple voltage or current through simulation? In addition, what other parameters should be considered when selecting the inductor? Here, [3] Capacitor C is a film capacitor. The withstand voltage of the capacitor should only be greater than the voltage amplitude of my analog signal (1 times), 1.414*8=12V. However, when I see the capacitor C of the LC filter circuit of the same chip from TI, the withstand voltage of the film capacitor is 250V (as shown in Figure 2). Why is this the case? Do all film capacitors have a larger withstand voltage? Figure 2

This post is from Analog electronics

Latest reply

The audio range is generally considered to be 20Hz~20KHz.  Details Published on 2019-5-7 08:40

2w

Posts

0

Resources
2
 
Changed to 100Hz-16kHz again? Can your speakers produce 16kHz sound? Speakers that can work up to 16kHz are much more expensive than your Class D power amplifier chip.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

The playback frequency of this speaker can be played first and then L and C can be selected according to theoretical calculations. Please answer the questions I posted for the first time.  Details Published on 2019-4-29 16:18
 
 

887

Posts

0

Resources
3
 
maychang posted on 2019-4-29 16:15 Changed to 100Hz-16kHz again? Can your speakers produce 16kHz sound? Speakers that can work up to 16kHz are better than your Class D power amplifier chip...
You can play the playback frequency of this speaker first and then select L and C according to theoretical calculations. Please answer the questions I posted for the first time.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Let's not talk about LC filtering first, let's talk about current calculation. Your speaker impedance is 2 ohms, can the power amplifier output 40W? It should be noted that the output power of the power amplifier is not fixed. You can find this out by checking the datasheet.  Details Published on 2019-4-29 16:49
 
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
4
 
shaorc posted on 2019-4-29 16:18 You can first play the playback frequency of this speaker and then select L and C according to theoretical calculations. Please answer the questions I posted for the first time
Let's not talk about LC filtering, let's talk about current calculation. Your speaker impedance is 2 ohms, can the power amplifier output 40W? It should be noted that the output power of the power amplifier is not fixed. You can find out this by checking the datasheet.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

[attachimg]411658[/attachimg] is OK  Details Published on 2019-4-29 17:22
 
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
5
 
The withstand voltage of film capacitors is generally large, because the withstand voltage is related to the thickness of the film, and the thicker the film, the higher the withstand voltage. However, it is difficult to manufacture a film that is too thin.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

"The withstand voltage of film capacitors is generally large, because the withstand voltage is related to the thickness of the film. The thicker the film, the higher the withstand voltage. However, it is difficult to manufacture a film that is too thin." According to your logic, shouldn't the withstand voltage be high if the film is thin? Otherwise, how can the withstand voltage of film capacitors be large?  Details Published on 2019-4-29 17:00
 
 
 
 

887

Posts

0

Resources
6
 
maychang published on 2019-4-29 16:51 The withstand voltage of thin film capacitors is generally large, because the withstand voltage is related to the thickness of the film, and the thicker the film, the higher the withstand voltage. However, it is difficult to manufacture a film that is too thin.
"The withstand voltage of thin film capacitors is generally large, because the withstand voltage is related to the thickness of the film, and the thicker the film, the higher the withstand voltage. However, it is difficult to manufacture a film that is too thin." According to your logic, shouldn't it be the thinner the film, the higher the withstand voltage? Otherwise, how can the withstand voltage of thin film capacitors be so large?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

"According to your logic, shouldn't the thinner the membrane, the higher the pressure resistance?" That's impossible. You can find out the relationship between the pressure resistance value of air at a certain pressure (air gap is broken) and the distance.  Details Published on 2019-4-29 17:24
 
 
 
 

887

Posts

0

Resources
7
 
maychang posted on 2019-4-29 16:49 Let's not talk about LC filtering, let's talk about the calculation of current. Your speaker impedance is 2 ohms, can the power amplifier output 40W? It should be noted that the output power of the power amplifier is not...
Yes, it can
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

So, where does your 40W come from? You can't control your Class D power amplifier chip to output exactly 40W of power, because you can't control the input signal (microphone, recorder, etc.). What if the person using the microphone shouts loudly?  Details Published on 2019-4-29 17:27
 
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
8
 
shaorc posted on 2019-4-29 17:00 "The withstand voltage of film capacitors is generally large, because the withstand voltage is related to the thickness of the film. The thicker the film, the higher the withstand voltage. However, it is difficult to manufacture a film that is too thin." Press...
"According to your logic, shouldn't the thinner the film, the higher the withstand voltage?" That's impossible. You can find out by looking up the relationship between the withstand voltage of air at a certain pressure (air gap breakdown) and the distance.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
9
 
So, how did you get the 40W? You can't control your Class D power amplifier chip to output exactly 40W of power, because you can't control the input signal (microphone, recorder, etc.). What if the person using the microphone shouts hard?
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

When designing this, it should be ensured that when the input signal amplitude is at its maximum, it can output a maximum power value of 40W. As for the amplitude range of the input audio signal, it seems to be quite confusing at present (the standard of audio source is not uniform). I personally consider it as 0.2Vrms-2Vrms, and add a limiting circuit to ensure a larger  Details Published on 2019-4-30 10:18
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
10
 
【1】But according to the formula f=1/2*pi*root LC, the cut-off frequency is calculated to be 13kHz, not 16kHz. Does this mean that we need to reselect the value of LC? -------Are you using the TI calculation table I uploaded? The cut-off frequency of 13KHz should be the f0 I mentioned in yesterday's post, and the cut-off frequency fc should be the frequency of the intersection of the speaker curve and the horizontal axis (-3dB) in the right graph (the Q value calculated by your parameters is greater than 0.707, so the cut-off frequency will be higher than 13KHz).
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Thank you, I don't understand here, can you explain it with a diagram, fc and fo, and how to see that the cutoff frequency you said is higher than 13khz. I remember that teacher maychang said that the two values of the second-order filter circuit are not the same  Details Published on 2019-5-6 18:11
Thank you, I don't understand here, can you explain it with a diagram, fc and fo, and how to see that the cutoff frequency you said is higher than 13khz. I remember that teacher maychang said that the two values of the second-order filter circuit are not the same  Details Published on 2019-4-29 19:15
 
 
 
 

887

Posts

0

Resources
11
 
topwon posted on 2019-4-29 18:22 【1】But according to the formula f=1/2*pi*root LC, the cutoff frequency is calculated to be 13kHz, not 16kHz. Does this mean that we need to reselect the value of LC? -- ...
Thank you, I don't understand here. Can you illustrate fc and fo, and how to see that the cutoff frequency you said is higher than 13khz? I remember that teacher Maychang said that these two values are not the same for the second-order filter circuit
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
12
 
f=1/2*pi*root LC, where f should be the resonant frequency f0 of the LC circuit, which should also be called the natural frequency (or center frequency?). The cutoff frequency fc is generally the frequency point corresponding to -3dB, which can be found on the amplitude-frequency response curve (the two orange circles on the right side of the figure, the rightmost is a partial enlargement, and the horizontal axis is the -3dB line). The Ti calculation table uses cut-off to describe f0, which I personally think is wrong. If you choose a suitable load resistance value (such as 1.733 ohms) so that the Q value is equal to 0.707, the two will be equivalent (the curve corresponding to 1.733 ohms in the picture will intersect with -3dB at 13KHz).
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

I have a question about this graph. Since you also said that the frequency fo calculated according to the formula is the resonant frequency, and the cutoff frequency fc is the frequency corresponding to a 3dB drop in gain, and the orange circle represents the cutoff frequency fc, then where is the resonant frequency fo calculated earlier on this graph? Is it higher than the cutoff frequency fc?  Details Published on 2019-5-5 11:30
I have a question about this graph. Since you also said that the frequency fo calculated according to the formula is the resonant frequency, and the cutoff frequency fc is the frequency corresponding to a 3dB drop in gain, and the orange circle represents the cutoff frequency fc, then where is the resonant frequency fo calculated earlier on this graph? Is it higher than the cutoff frequency fc?  Details Published on 2019-4-30 16:08
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
13
 
In view of your specific design requirement of 100Hz-16kHz, I think the first thing to consider is to make the inductance value as small as possible (the volume cost can be reduced, and the current can be easily increased). In addition, the accuracy range of the components needs to be considered. The inductance is generally 20%, the film capacitor is considered 5%, and the load resistance will be more complicated (because the speaker is not a pure resistive load in fact). Let's assume it is 10%. You need to ensure that the fc calculated within the accuracy range of the LCR component can be greater than the 16KHz you require. In fact, for this kind of actual product, if I make it myself, I will make fc above 20KHz, because the main function of this LC low-pass filter is to remove the switching frequency of the class D amplifier (equivalent to the carrier frequency), which is generally several hundred KHz. In this way, even if fc is 4 or 50KHz, there should be no problem (in fact, many products that do not consider EMI issues can save this LC and directly use the low-pass filter characteristics of the human ear to remove the carrier frequency). In this way, the inductance and capacitance values can be smaller, which is convenient for selecting suitable materials (volume, cost, supply, etc.).
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
14
 
3. The general withstand voltage of film capacitors is 50V-63V-100V-250V DC. The higher the withstand voltage, the larger the price and size should be. Generally, it should be OK to take a value higher than PVDD (it should not be compared with the audio analog voltage amplitude, because LC filters the square wave of PVDD amplitude, and some overshoot margin should also be considered). For example, there should be no problem with a 50V withstand voltage film capacitor for a 24V-36V power supply. I have not tried using a 63V withstand voltage for a 48V power supply, but my personal analysis shows that it is OK.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Thank you. The analysis here is very clear. But there is a point that hits the mark of what I want to know: "The general value is compared with PVDD (it should not be compared with the audio analog voltage amplitude, because LC filters the square wave of PVDD amplitude." I didn't understand the amplitude of the PWM wave and the analog signal sine wave before and after filtering. Now I understand  Details Published on 2019-4-30 10:43
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
15
 
【2】Since the channel power is 40W and the effective value of the analog audio signal is 8V, the current of the inductor L is 5A. So when selecting L, how large should the selected inductor current be? ----40W@2 ohms, why is it 8Vrms? It should be about 8.9Vrms, right? How did you calculate the 5A current of the inductor? 40W/8V (actually 40W/8.9V) ?This is the average value of the inductor current. The nominal current value of the inductor should be greater than the average current + the peak value of the ripple current. The peak value of the ripple current should have a corresponding calculation formula for each power amplifier chip.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

1048

Posts

1

Resources
16
 
maychang posted on 2019-4-29 17:27 So, how did you get your 400,000? You can't control your Class D power amplifier chip to output exactly 40W of power, because the input signal (microphone, recording...
When designing this specifically, it should be ensured that when the input signal amplitude is the largest, the maximum power value of 40W can be output. The amplitude range of the input audio signal seems to be quite confusing at present (the standards of audio sources are not uniform). I personally consider it as 0.2Vrms-2Vrms, and add a limiting circuit to ensure that a larger signal will not damage the subsequent stage. Some high-end power amplifiers will have input sensitivity adjustment capabilities to more conveniently match the amplitude of various audio source signals. His product is used in specific occasions, and the selection and compatibility of the pre-stage audio source will probably be relatively easier to handle.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

The poster used a Class D power amplifier chip, but did not specify the chip's power supply voltage. For the chip, the power supply voltage determines the maximum output power, and the poster may not be aware of this. If the amplifier's maximum output power is much greater than the speaker's rated power, then the speaker is dangerous when it is working.  Details Published on 2019-4-30 10:38
 
 
 
 

2921

Posts

0

Resources
17
 
What the 13th poster said makes sense. It is a bit like trying to find a sword by carving a mark on the boat to find a sword. If you want to learn LC filter design, it is best to read some relevant books. Many design software on the Internet only give results. If you don't know the principle, you will be confused by it. Take the design of the first post as an example. I roughly verified that it is a Chebyshev type low-pass filter with an in-band fluctuation of 0.25dB. The -3dB bandwidth is indeed around 16kHz.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

Thanks for your advice. I am also looking for information in books, but books always like to use 5th-order LC low-pass filtering as an example.  Details Published on 2019-4-30 10:39
 
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
18
 
topwon posted on 2019-4-30 10:18 When designing this specifically, it should be ensured that when the input signal amplitude is the largest, it can output a maximum power value of 40W. The amplitude of the input audio signal...
The original poster used a Class D power amplifier chip, but did not specify the supply voltage of the chip. For the chip, the supply voltage determines the maximum output power, and the original poster may not be aware of this. If the maximum output power of the amplifier is much greater than the rated power of the speaker, then the speaker is dangerous when working, and the original poster does not seem to be aware of this.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

887

Posts

0

Resources
19
 
gmchen posted on 2019-4-30 10:37 What the 13th floor said makes sense. So it's a bit like trying to find a sword by carving a mark on a boat to find a sword. If you want to learn LC filter design...
Thank you for your advice. I am also reading books to check information, but the books always like to use the 5th order LC low-pass filter as an example.
This post is from Analog electronics

Comments

The order does not matter, as long as the principle is mastered, in principle any order can be calculated. The examples are just to help readers understand the formulas.  Details Published on 2019-4-30 10:46
 
 
 
 

2921

Posts

0

Resources
20
 
The cutoff frequency of the LC filter is not simply calculated as 1/(2*pi*sqrt(LC)). This is because the impact of the load and signal source internal resistance on the Q value of the LC loop must be considered, and for filters higher than the second order, there is also the mutual impact of the previous and next stages.
This post is from Analog electronics
 
 
 
 

Guess Your Favourite
Just looking around
Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

Related articles more>>

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list