Baidu's self-driving minibus "Apollo" project has been reported to have its main staff withdrawn and product promotion has been stopped. According to people familiar with the matter, the project's input-output ratio is different from expectations, so the project promotion and sales are currently suspended.
However, some industry insiders believe that Baidu's "Apollo" project is more like a test, and its real purpose is to open up new territory for the RoboTaxi market, which has great potential in the future.
The field of autonomous driving has been cooling down since the end of 2018. Problems such as the difficulty of industrial implementation and technical shortcomings have slowed down the development of personal autonomous vehicles. Well-known companies such as Baidu Apollo, Google Waymo, and Uber are constantly adjusting their business directions to adapt to the latest changes in the industry. Interestingly, they have surprisingly set their goals in the same direction - RoboTaxi.
Why develop RoboTaxi?
RoboTaxi, at first glance, looks like the words "robot" and "taxi" spelled together, also written as "Robo-Taxi" or "Robo-Cab". Translated into Chinese, it means: self-driving or driverless taxi, a self-driving car service. With the advancement of self-driving technology, some car manufacturers or self-driving solution providers have begun to change their thinking: from allowing every user to have a self-driving vehicle, to providing self-driving vehicle services.
When it comes to the reasons for this change in thinking, each company has different explanations, but in summary, they are mainly concentrated in the following points:
Technical issues. Judging from the current maturity of technology, it is still difficult to build self-driving vehicles. Although various solution providers have stated that they can upgrade vehicles to self-driving with a single click, there are still many problems in actual operation.
Cost issue. Both autonomous driving solution providers and car manufacturers face the issue of cost. With the current public attitude towards autonomous driving vehicles, except for a small number of technology enthusiasts and curious people, most users are in a state of indifference. Therefore, it is still unknown how many users are really willing to pay for a self-driving car.
Safety issues. The biggest concern for users of self-driving vehicles is safety. If an ordinary user has an accident after purchasing a vehicle, there is a lack of relevant legal or policy support for the division of responsibilities, accident assessment standards, and punishment mechanisms around the world.
In summary, some manufacturers believe that launching autonomous driving services is the best solution. In terms of advantages, launching RoboTaxi has the following three aspects:
Although there are still shortcomings in technology, compared with the "one-click" upgrade, the technical complexity of directly building an autonomous vehicle through cooperation between solution providers and car manufacturers is relatively smaller and more mature;
Since most users are unwilling to buy driverless cars individually, cooperating with car manufacturers to launch ride-hailing services is indeed the most appropriate solution. Users can experience the convenience of driverless cars without worrying about whether to buy one themselves.
Individual users may be unfamiliar with the operation and make mistakes, which will cause difficulties in subsequent work such as accountability if an accident occurs. If it is handed over directly to the service provider, the responsibility can be divided and handled by directly connecting with the service provider.
Current Development Status Abroad
RoboTaxi services abroad are mainly concentrated in North America.
In August 2016, NuTonomy, a spin-off from MIT, became the first company to launch a RoboTaxi service in a limited area of Singapore, and a month later, Uber followed suit.
In early 2017, Waymo, Google's self-driving company, began large-scale RoboTaxi testing in Phoenix; in May of the same year, Waymo announced that it would jointly launch RoboTaxi services with Lyft.
From 2017 to 2018, car manufacturers such as BMW, Volkswagen, General Motors, and Ford, together with Intel, Nvidia, Google, Lyft and other companies, entered the RoboTaxi market, which was also the hottest period for autonomous driving.
In April 2019, Tesla founder Elon Musk publicly stated that he would establish a Tesla RoboTaxi network in 2020. As part of the Tesla network's "RoboTaxi" service, vehicle owners can earn up to $30,000 per year. Musk has set his sights on the autonomous mobility as a service (MaaS) market. In a conference call after Tesla announced the rate hike, Musk pointed out that RoboTaxi could eventually push the company to a market value of $500 billion.
It is worth mentioning that: just like the promise of "achieving full autonomous driving in 2020", most companies set 2025 as the target year for the full realization of RoboTaxi.
In Asia, in addition to Singapore, some companies in Japan are also conducting RoboTaxi tests, and a joint venture between DeNA and ZMP plans to provide self-driving taxi services for the 2020 Olympic Games.
New Chinese Players
How can the bustling RoboTaxi market be without Chinese players?
In June 2019, Baidu obtained a license to operate RoboTaxi services in Changsha, which means that Baidu is very likely to become one of the first companies to operate in China.
On August 5, 2019, Didi Chuxing announced that its autonomous driving department was upgraded to an independent company, focusing on autonomous driving research and development, product application and related business expansion. It is understood that RoboTaxi is also one of the main businesses developed by Didi Autonomous Driving Company. As a domestic travel service provider, Didi seems to have an inherent advantage in this field.
On August 7, 2019, autonomous driving startup WeRide announced the establishment of a joint venture, WeRide, with South China's largest taxi company, Guangzhou Baiyun Taxi Group Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Guangzhou Public Transport Group, and Science City (Guangzhou) Investment Group Co., Ltd., focusing on RoboTaxi and jointly developing new autonomous driving travel.
In the near future, there may be a "big melee" in the RoboTaxi field. Will the travel companies with inherent market advantages be able to seize the initiative, or will the technology companies with solutions be able to catch up? Everything is unknown, but it is also exciting. I believe that the perfect combination of technology and service can bring users the ultimate travel experience.
Previous article:After 30 years of changes, automotive integrators are gradually coming to the fore
Next article:Tesla Semi achieves expected range, 960 kilometers?
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- Sn-doped CuO nanostructure-based ethanol gas sensor for real-time drunk driving detection in vehicles
- Design considerations for automotive battery wiring harness
- Do you know all the various motors commonly used in automotive electronics?
- What are the functions of the Internet of Vehicles? What are the uses and benefits of the Internet of Vehicles?
- Power Inverter - A critical safety system for electric vehicles
- Analysis of the information security mechanism of AUTOSAR, the automotive embedded software framework
- Brief Analysis of Automotive Ethernet Test Content and Test Methods
- How haptic technology can enhance driving safety
- Let’s talk about the “Three Musketeers” of radar in autonomous driving
Professor at Beihang University, dedicated to promoting microcontrollers and embedded systems for over 20 years.
- LED chemical incompatibility test to see which chemicals LEDs can be used with
- Application of ARM9 hardware coprocessor on WinCE embedded motherboard
- What are the key points for selecting rotor flowmeter?
- LM317 high power charger circuit
- A brief analysis of Embest's application and development of embedded medical devices
- Single-phase RC protection circuit
- stm32 PVD programmable voltage monitor
- Introduction and measurement of edge trigger and level trigger of 51 single chip microcomputer
- Improved design of Linux system software shell protection technology
- What to do if the ABB robot protection device stops
- Sn-doped CuO nanostructure-based ethanol gas sensor for real-time drunk driving detection in vehicles
- Design considerations for automotive battery wiring harness
- Do you know all the various motors commonly used in automotive electronics?
- What are the functions of the Internet of Vehicles? What are the uses and benefits of the Internet of Vehicles?
- Power Inverter - A critical safety system for electric vehicles
- Analysis of the information security mechanism of AUTOSAR, the automotive embedded software framework
- Brief Analysis of Automotive Ethernet Test Content and Test Methods
- How haptic technology can enhance driving safety
- Let’s talk about the “Three Musketeers” of radar in autonomous driving
- Why software-defined vehicles transform cars from tools into living spaces
- The physical meaning of FFT results
- MSP430 - Timer_A timer interrupt program
- Buck switching power supply MOS tube gate has pwm signal, but cannot conduct normally
- Motor Driver
- Sharing on the serious problem of LM2611 output voltage heating
- How much do you know about the "ADI Inside" behind these popular healthcare products?
- 4.3-inch split-screen display
- Recommend a 24-bit ADC module (not a chip), preferably with the same pin definition as the attachment, 12 pins, SPI interface...
- Reasons why the POE module does not supply power
- What are the types of LDOs used in portable mobile devices? Ripple test methods