Recently, according to foreign media reports, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) found that as the functions of autonomous driving systems gradually become richer, users' understanding of the systems began to develop cognitive biases. The agency also collected information displayed on the dashboard to confirm whether car companies provide users with correct information about semi-autonomous driving systems.
IIHS asked 2,000 respondents about five different Level 2 autonomous driving systems, including Cadillac's Super Cruise, Tesla's Autopilot, Audi and Acura's Traffic Jam Assist, BMW's Driving Assistant Plus and Nissan's ProPilot Assist. During the survey, IIHS did not tell respondents the names of the car companies that correspond to these Level 2 autonomous driving systems.
Take Tesla as an example. Although the official website states that Autopilot still requires active monitoring by the driver, the survey shows that Autopilot is the most misleading to the respondents. Nearly 50% of users believe that this Tesla in-vehicle system allows users to take their hands off the steering wheel after starting the system. In contrast, the proportion of respondents who were misled by other systems is only 33% or less.
The survey found that most people know when the adaptive cruise control system adjusts the speed or detects a vehicle in front, but many do not understand why the system cannot detect vehicles farther away. In addition, users do not understand when the lane keeping assist system is "inactive", even those who have received simple training do not understand this, and cannot explain why the system is still inactive in this situation. In such cases, the driver needs to take over the control of the vehicle again, or even apply the brakes.
Whether automakers will provide more detailed information about autonomous driving systems in the future remains to be seen. Due to the large differences in the names of various brands, the American Automobile Association has begun to address the naming and branding issues of such systems, hoping to standardize the names of the current nine popular driver assistance systems.
In addition, among various autonomous driving assistance systems, nearly 40% of Americans hope that Tesla Autopilot and Nissan ProPilot Assist technologies can achieve fully autonomous driving functions.
Previous article:An article reveals Alibaba's layout of the intelligent connected car ecosystem
Next article:How to design a better human-computer interface
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- Innolux's intelligent steer-by-wire solution makes cars smarter and safer
- 8051 MCU - Parity Check
- How to efficiently balance the sensitivity of tactile sensing interfaces
- What should I do if the servo motor shakes? What causes the servo motor to shake quickly?
- 【Brushless Motor】Analysis of three-phase BLDC motor and sharing of two popular development boards
- Midea Industrial Technology's subsidiaries Clou Electronics and Hekang New Energy jointly appeared at the Munich Battery Energy Storage Exhibition and Solar Energy Exhibition
- Guoxin Sichen | Application of ferroelectric memory PB85RS2MC in power battery management, with a capacity of 2M
- Analysis of common faults of frequency converter
- In a head-on competition with Qualcomm, what kind of cockpit products has Intel come up with?
- Dalian Rongke's all-vanadium liquid flow battery energy storage equipment industrialization project has entered the sprint stage before production
- Allegro MicroSystems Introduces Advanced Magnetic and Inductive Position Sensing Solutions at Electronica 2024
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- High-speed electronic switches
- Negative feedback delay problem of power amplifier
- Wireless Mesh Network Technology Foundation and Application
- Coreless (standard low voltage) DC servo motor
- 【SAMR21 New Gameplay】1. Introduction
- Looking for several wifi modules
- What should I pay attention to when making PCB samples?
- EEWORLD University Hall----Intelligent Control System
- Body fat scale is broken, pry it open and see
- 【New Year's Festival Competition】+ "Big Head Doll" Amusement Park