Starting from the u~H curve of soft magnetic materials, the influence of the number of turns N of the test coil on the test results in the measurement of magnetic permeability u is studied. The reason why the magnetic permeability u value is the highest when N takes a certain value is explained. The influence of the radial non-uniformity of the test magnetic field H on the test sample ring is solved by the integration method. The difference between the ring magnetic permeability and the real magnetic permeability of the material is pointed out. The method of measuring the initial magnetic permeability ui of the material with a simple instrument is introduced.
As we all know, $magnetic permeability$μ is a key technical indicator of soft magnetic materials. The measurement of magnetic permeability μ is basically measured by winding on a standard sample ring. The inductance L of the winding coil is measured, and then the magnetic permeability of the material is calculated using L. However, for the same sample ring, the measured material magnetic permeability μ may vary greatly if different instruments or the same instrument are used for different test turns. Sometimes this will cause contradictions or disputes between the supply and demand parties. In particular, the different test μ values caused by different test coil turns, sometimes the μ value measured with more turns is lower, but sometimes the μ value measured with more turns becomes higher. This will confuse some testers. This article attempts to explain the impact of different test instruments, test coil turns and calculation formulas on magnetic permeability testing based on the test principle.
Related concepts of magnetic permeability
For a uniform magnetic medium, if it is placed in a uniform magnetic field H and magnetized, the magnetic medium itself will generate an additional magnetic field H', and the direction of H' is the same as that of H. The total magnetic field strength of H' and H is called the magnetic flux density B of this magnetic material [1]. It can be seen that the magnetic flux density B and the magnetic field strength H are essentially physical quantities that characterize the strength of the magnetic field. However, the names and sizes of the units they use may be different. In the Gaussian unit system commonly used, the unit of H is Oersted (Oe) and the unit of B is Gauss (Gs). The two units of Oersted and Gauss have different names but are exactly the same in size. In the International System of Units that is now emphasized, the unit of B is Tesla (T) and the unit of H is Ampere per meter (A/m). The units of B and H are no longer equal, 1A/m = 4×10-7T. The ratio of magnetic flux density to magnetic field strength is called the magnetic permeability of the material. The ratio of their numerical values is called absolute magnetic permeability μabsolute, and the ratio of the sizes of these two physical quantities is called relative magnetic permeability μ. Obviously, in the Gaussian system of units, since the units of B and H are equal, the ratio of their numerical values is equal to the ratio of their magnitudes. Therefore, in the Gaussian system of units, the relative magnetic permeability of the material is equal to the absolute magnetic permeability, and there is no need to distinguish between absolute magnetic permeability and relative magnetic permeability. For a vacuum, it will not produce an additional magnetic field, and B is equal to H, so the magnetic permeability of the vacuum is equal to 1. In the International System of Units, since the unit sizes of B and H are no longer equal, their numerical ratio μ can never represent the ratio of their physical quantities μ, and the relative magnetic permeability of the material is no longer equal to its absolute magnetic permeability. For a vacuum, since no additional magnetic field can be produced, the two physical quantities B and H are equal, so the equal magnetic permeability μ of the vacuum is equal to 1. If the magnetic field intensity H at a point in the vacuum is yA/m, then the magnetic flux density B at that point should be 4πy×10-7T, so the numerical ratio of B and H at that point is the absolute magnetic permeability of the vacuum in the International System of Units μ0=4π×10-7H/m. Generally, the absolute magnetic permeability of a soft magnetic material is divided by μ0 to obtain its relative magnetic permeability μ=B/μ0H. Unless otherwise specified, the reference to magnetic permeability refers to the relative magnetic permeability.
Previous article:Research on the application of wireless temperature measurement technology in high-voltage switchgear monitoring
Next article:Detailed explanation of the basic principle of resistor current detection
- Keysight Technologies Helps Samsung Electronics Successfully Validate FiRa® 2.0 Safe Distance Measurement Test Case
- From probes to power supplies, Tektronix is leading the way in comprehensive innovation in power electronics testing
- Seizing the Opportunities in the Chinese Application Market: NI's Challenges and Answers
- Tektronix Launches Breakthrough Power Measurement Tools to Accelerate Innovation as Global Electrification Accelerates
- Not all oscilloscopes are created equal: Why ADCs and low noise floor matter
- Enable TekHSI high-speed interface function to accelerate the remote transmission of waveform data
- How to measure the quality of soft start thyristor
- How to use a multimeter to judge whether a soft starter is good or bad
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of non-contact temperature sensors?
- Innolux's intelligent steer-by-wire solution makes cars smarter and safer
- 8051 MCU - Parity Check
- How to efficiently balance the sensitivity of tactile sensing interfaces
- What should I do if the servo motor shakes? What causes the servo motor to shake quickly?
- 【Brushless Motor】Analysis of three-phase BLDC motor and sharing of two popular development boards
- Midea Industrial Technology's subsidiaries Clou Electronics and Hekang New Energy jointly appeared at the Munich Battery Energy Storage Exhibition and Solar Energy Exhibition
- Guoxin Sichen | Application of ferroelectric memory PB85RS2MC in power battery management, with a capacity of 2M
- Analysis of common faults of frequency converter
- In a head-on competition with Qualcomm, what kind of cockpit products has Intel come up with?
- Dalian Rongke's all-vanadium liquid flow battery energy storage equipment industrialization project has entered the sprint stage before production
- Allegro MicroSystems Introduces Advanced Magnetic and Inductive Position Sensing Solutions at Electronica 2024
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- MPS Mall Big Discount Experience Season
- 【IoT Smart Home System】---Temperature and humidity data collection and upload (1)
- Zhang Chaoyang questioned 5G: Such high-frequency electromagnetic waves are very harmful to the human body
- Design of a small dual-band RF energy receiving antenna
- What are the definitions of linear power supply, switching power supply, and thyristor power supply? What are their differences? What are their applications? What are their advantages and disadvantages?
- WZ-S formaldehyde sensor assembly
- Goodbye 2019, hello 2020! Year-end summary and New Year's plan
- Sixth finger
- What exactly is UWB technology?
- [NXP Rapid IoT Review] Rapid IoT Studio Simple Programming Step 3 Bluetooth Connection Control Test