LDW (According ISO17361)
1. Definition
Warning threshold
The position of the vehicle on the road when the alarm is issued corresponds to the alarm trigger point set inside the system.
warning threshold placement zone
The area between the earliest alarm line and the latest alarm line, within which the alarm threshold is set.
Curve cutting is a driving behavior that can lead to intentional lane departure and driving toward the inside of the curve.
Chinese lane parameters (refer to GB5768_1999'Road traffic signs and markings'):
Lane width: between 3.0m and 3.75m.
Lane width: 10, 15 or 20 cm.
Lanes of different directions: 4 m (solid line) + 6 m (empty);
Lane lines in the same direction: 2 m (solid line) + 4 m (empty) for urban roads; 6 m (solid line) +9 m (empty) for expressways.
2. Example diagram
3. System functional requirements and classification
4. Test basic scenarios
4.1 Test environment conditions
The following test environmental conditions were employed.
a) Test location: dry and flat asphalt or concrete road surface;
b) Test temperature range: -20℃~40℃;
c) Visible lane markings on the test road surface should be in good condition and comply with the requirements of GB5768.
d) Horizontal visibility should be greater than 1 km.
4.2 Test lane conditions
The radius of curvature of the test lane should be within ±10% of the minimum radius of curvature of the corresponding type in Table 1. The test lane should be long enough to meet the minimum operating speed requirement (i.e. 20m/s for Type I and 17m/s for Type II), so that the vehicle can leave the lane at a departure speed of 0m/s﹤v ≤0.8m/s.
4.3 Test vehicle conditions
The mass of the test vehicle should be between the total mass of the vehicle's curb weight plus the driver and test equipment (the total mass of the driver and test equipment shall not exceed 150kg) and the maximum allowable total mass. The description of the mass should comply with the requirements of 3.2 of GB/T3730.2-1996. The conditions of the test vehicle are not allowed to be changed after the test begins.
4.4 Test system installation and setup
The installation and setting of the lane departure warning system shall be carried out in accordance with the equipment instructions provided by the manufacturer. For the testing of the lane departure warning system with user-adjustable warning thresholds, each test shall be carried out twice, i.e. once with the warning threshold set at the earliest warning threshold and once with the warning threshold set at the latest warning threshold. It is not allowed to change the system settings after the test has started.
4.5 Test Output
Parameters obtained from the data record The following parameters are obtained from the data record:
a) Alarm trigger point (time and/or space);
b) deviation speed;
c) Vehicle speed.
The test equipment records all alarm information during the test and obtains the required parameters from it.
testing scenarios
ØScenario 1: Alarm generation test
The vehicle should be basically in the center of the lane at the beginning of the test. When the vehicle enters the test lane for tracking and reaches a stable state, the vehicle can gradually deviate to the inside and outside of the curve. The vehicle's curve speed is selected according to the system classification in Table 1, that is, 20m/s~22m/s for Type I and 17m/s~19m/s for Type II. The vehicle should deviate once to the left and once to the right in two deviation speed ranges (0.0m/s~0.4m/s and 0.4m/s~0.8m/s) in both right and left turns. Eight deviation conditions can be combined, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 5.
table 3
Figure 5 Alarm test method
ØScenario 2: Repeatability test
Repeatability testing should be conducted on a straight road section. The vehicle speed is selected according to the system classification in Table 1, 20m/s~22m/s for Type I system and 17m/s~19m/s for Type II system. The vehicle can drive along the center of the lane, or drive close to the lane marking on the other side opposite to the lane marking that the vehicle is about to deviate from and cross. For example, if the lane is about to deviate to the right, the vehicle can drive along the lane marking on the left, and vice versa, as shown in Figure 6. After the vehicle tracks along the test lane at the specified speed and reaches a stable state, the vehicle can gradually deviate to the left and right sides of the lane. When the deviation speed is 0.1m/s﹤(V1±0.05)≤0.3m/s, two groups of eight tests are conducted (four left deviations in the first group and four right deviations in the second group); when the deviation speed is 0.6m/s﹤(V2±0.05)≤0.8m/s, another two groups of eight tests are conducted (four left deviations in the third group and four right deviations in the fourth group), that is, a total of 16 tests are required. V1 and V2 are pre-selected by the equipment manufacturer. The test system should be tested sequentially in groups (four tests per group) according to the deviation speed shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Figure 6 Repeatability test method
ØScenario 3: False Alarm Test
The test lane is a straight road with a total length of 1000m (one straight road with a length of 1000m or two straight roads with a length of 500m). When the vehicle is driving in the non-alarm area, the system should not issue an alarm and record the system alarm situation.
Test pass criteria:
ØAlarm generation test
In each test, the system should ensure that the alarm is issued after the vehicle crosses the earliest alarm line and before crossing the latest alarm line.
ØRepeatability test
For each test group, the system alarm threshold should always be located within a fixed area of 0.3m width. When the vehicle is outside the alarm threshold setting area, the system should not issue an alarm. If a test group includes more than 4 tests, and all are within the corresponding deviation speed range, only the first 4 tests are considered.
ØFalse Alarm Test
When the vehicle is between the two earliest warning lines on the left and right (i.e., non-warning area), the system should not issue an alarm.
scene 1 | 1-1 | Type I, right turn, left deviation |
1-2 | Type I, right turn, right deviation | |
1-3 | Type I, left turn, left deviation | |
1-4 | Type I, left turn and right deviation | |
1-5 | Type II, right turn, left deviation | |
1-6 | Type II, right turn, right deviation | |
1-7 | Type II, left turn, left deviation | |
1-8 | Type II, left turn and right deviation | |
field scene 2 | 2-1 | Type I, the straight car deviates to the left in the middle |
2-2 | Type I, the car on the straight road deviates to the left | |
2-3 | Type I: Straight road car deviates to the right or left | |
2-4 | Type I, the straight car position deviates to the left at will | |
2-5 | Type I: the straight car deviates to the right in the middle | |
2-6 | Type I: The car on the straight road deviates to the left or right | |
2-7 | Type I: Straight road car deviates to the right | |
2-8 | Type I, the straight car position deviates to the right arbitrarily | |
2-9 | Type II, the straight car deviates to the left in the middle | |
2-10 | Type II, the car on the straight road deviates to the left | |
2-11 | Type II: Straight road car deviates to the right or left | |
2-12 | Type II, the straight car position deviates to the left at will | |
2-13 | Type II, the straight car deviates to the right in the middle | |
2-14 | Type II: The car on the straight road deviates to the left or right | |
2-15 | Type II, the car on the straight road deviates to the right | |
2-16 | Type II, the straight car position deviates to the right arbitrarily | |
field scene 3 | 3-1 | A 1000-meter straight run without deviation |
3-2 | No deviation on the 500m straight track at both ends |
Previous article:Design and implementation of a safe driving system based on Zynq AP SoC
Next article:Design of blind spot warning system for sharp turns on the road using CC430
- Popular Resources
- Popular amplifiers
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- Innolux's intelligent steer-by-wire solution makes cars smarter and safer
- 8051 MCU - Parity Check
- How to efficiently balance the sensitivity of tactile sensing interfaces
- What should I do if the servo motor shakes? What causes the servo motor to shake quickly?
- 【Brushless Motor】Analysis of three-phase BLDC motor and sharing of two popular development boards
- Midea Industrial Technology's subsidiaries Clou Electronics and Hekang New Energy jointly appeared at the Munich Battery Energy Storage Exhibition and Solar Energy Exhibition
- Guoxin Sichen | Application of ferroelectric memory PB85RS2MC in power battery management, with a capacity of 2M
- Analysis of common faults of frequency converter
- In a head-on competition with Qualcomm, what kind of cockpit products has Intel come up with?
- Dalian Rongke's all-vanadium liquid flow battery energy storage equipment industrialization project has entered the sprint stage before production
- Allegro MicroSystems Introduces Advanced Magnetic and Inductive Position Sensing Solutions at Electronica 2024
- Car key in the left hand, liveness detection radar in the right hand, UWB is imperative for cars!
- After a decade of rapid development, domestic CIS has entered the market
- Aegis Dagger Battery + Thor EM-i Super Hybrid, Geely New Energy has thrown out two "king bombs"
- A brief discussion on functional safety - fault, error, and failure
- In the smart car 2.0 cycle, these core industry chains are facing major opportunities!
- The United States and Japan are developing new batteries. CATL faces challenges? How should China's new energy battery industry respond?
- Murata launches high-precision 6-axis inertial sensor for automobiles
- Ford patents pre-charge alarm to help save costs and respond to emergencies
- New real-time microcontroller system from Texas Instruments enables smarter processing in automotive and industrial applications
- EEWORLD University - Brushless Motor Tutorial
- Introduction to FPGA design process and tool software
- EEWORLD University----[High Precision Laboratory] Interface: RS-485
- 【Perf-V Review】VIVADO Flowing Light
- Newbie, please help me with CPLD frequency multiplication
- [The third stop of Shijian’s ADI journey] Learn about cutting-edge IoT devices and solutions, and win Kindle and other gifts
- Are there any netizens working in the field of motors?
- Evaluation report summary: Mir MYS-8MMX
- 2020 Share the beauty of Qingdao in my eyes
- Zigbee Technology Exchange