Can the Fluke Network Qualification Tester replace the Network Certification Tester?

Can Fluke Network Qualification Tester replace Network Certification Tester? Obviously, Fluke Qualification Tester cannot replace Certification Tester. Fluke Network Qualification Tester can solve the problem of "Can the cabling system support the selected network technology? For example, 100Base-Tx, Gigabit Ethernet, etc.)", and Fluke Network Certification Tester can solve the problem of "Does the cabling system meet the relevant standards? (For example, TIA-568-B.1 Category 6 link or ISO11801 2nd Edition E-level link standard)" This kind of instrument is suitable for professionals in cabling system to ensure that the new cabling system fully meets the requirements of the relevant cabling system standards.

If you are in a troubleshooting environment and need to clearly show whether the tested link passes the performance requirements of Category 5e or Category 6 according to TIA or ISO standards, then the Fluke Networks Certification Tester is your wise choice. If you are an integrator and need to show the owner that all links are installed correctly, you must perform certification testing. If you are facing the wiring test of optical cable and twisted pair at the same time, the Fluke Networks Certification Tester is a better choice.

If you are a network engineer, and you do not have a documented cabling system, and you need to know whether the system can support a 100Base-Tx network, the Fluke Networks Identification Cabling Tester is a faster and more economical choice to complete this work. If you are making a small number of additions, deletions, moves, changes, etc. on the basis of an existing cabling system, or if you are building a temporary network and only need to identify whether it supports a specific network technology, the identification test is sufficient. If you want to equip a large number of personnel with a cabling tester with strong cable diagnostic functions, the Fluke Networks Cable Identification Cabling Tester is a better choice from the perspective of contingency planning.