41
Published on 2018-9-3 20:46
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
I have said this more than once before, for example on the 27th floor: "The working principle of capacitor voltage reduction is that the capacitor limits the current, and the current output by the rectifier bridge is basically fixed." The voltage at both ends of the rectifier bridge output DC changes with the load. I also said on the 27th floor: What you said "at 220V, the input end is only about 11V~12V
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 14:38
| ||
|
||
|
44
Published on 2018-9-4 14:31
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
45
Published on 2018-9-4 14:38
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
K7812 efficiency is not calculated in this way. In fact, there is no need to calculate K7812 efficiency. We only need to know the load current. The load current includes the current passing through the two relay windings (according to you, the relay winding is 160 ohms, so the current of the two relay windings is 0.15A), plus other circuits (control relay action
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 17:16
K7812 efficiency is not calculated in this way. In fact, there is no need to calculate K7812 efficiency. We only need to know the load current. The load current includes the current passing through the two relay windings (according to you, the relay winding is 160 ohms, so the current of the two relay windings is 0.15A), plus other circuits (control relay action
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 17:14
K7812 efficiency is not calculated in this way. In fact, there is no need to calculate K7812 efficiency. We only need to know the load current. The load current includes the current passing through the two relay windings (according to you, the relay winding is 160 ohms, so the current of the two relay windings is 0.15A), plus other circuits (control relay action
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 17:07
| ||
|
||
|
47
Published on 2018-9-4 17:07
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The M54123 is a leakage detection chip. The working current of the power supply is 8mA, which is an order of magnitude lower than the load current of the two resistors of 0.15A. The static current of the K7812 is also 8mA. Then the working current of the transistors Q101 and Q102 that control the pull-in of the relay should also be small when they are turned on (I am not familiar with the working current of the transistor).
Details
Published on 2018-11-23 09:59
The M54123 is a leakage detection chip. The working current of the power supply is 8mA, which is an order of magnitude lower than the load current of the two resistors of 0.15A. The static current of the K7812 is also 8mA. Then the working current of the transistors Q101 and Q102 that control the pull-in of the relay should also be small when they are turned on (I am not familiar with the working current of the transistor).
Details
Published on 2018-11-23 09:41
The M54123 is a leakage detection chip. The working current of the power supply is 8mA, which is an order of magnitude lower than the load current of the two resistors of 0.15A. The static current of the K7812 is also 8mA. Then the working current of the transistors Q101 and Q102 that control the pull-in of the relay should also be small when they are turned on (I am not familiar with the working current of the transistor).
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 18:45
The M54123 is a leakage detection chip. The working current of the power supply is 8mA, which is an order of magnitude lower than the load current of the two resistors of 0.15A. The static current of the K7812 is also 8mA. Then the working current of the transistors Q101 and Q102 that control the pull-in of the relay should also be small when they are turned on (I am not familiar with the working current of the transistor).
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 18:41
| ||
|
||
|
48
Published on 2018-9-4 17:14
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Teacher, this is the calculation formula I found online to determine the output DC current of the rectifier bridge by the C101 capacitor (not sure if it is correct), which is consistent with the structure of my capacitor step-down circuit. The question here is about this 0.89*U/XC. Is the coefficient 0.89 the same as the coefficient 0.9 in the formula VL=0.9V2 in the bridge rectifier circuit introduced on the Internet?
Details
Published on 2018-11-23 10:08
| ||
|
||
|
49
Published on 2018-9-4 17:16
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
"I can't find the K7812 static current datasheet, only the no-load input current is 0.2mA." The no-load input current is the current consumed by the K7812 itself when the output is open. But this is not the static current, because the current consumed by the K7812 itself changes with the output current. However, the current consumed by the K7812 itself does not change.
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 18:58
| ||
|
||
|
52
Published on 2018-9-4 18:55
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
53
Published on 2018-9-4 18:58
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
In the complete circuit diagram, the 12V power supply is basically used to power M54123. The datasheet says that the power supply current is 8mA, and there is a 0.15A resistance load. The green light is basically very small at 0.003A, and the static current is 0.4A. Then the collector current Ic=1.5A written in the datasheet for Q101 and Q102 of the control relays should be
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 19:42
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
"Then the collector current Ic=1.5A written in the datasheet of Q101 and Q102, which control the relays, should be the maximum current carrying value of the tube." Yes.
Details
Published on 2018-9-4 20:28
| ||
|
||
|
55
Published on 2018-9-4 20:25
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
The two figures show the positive output efficiency/input voltage (full load) and the positive output efficiency/output load (nominal input). Is the output current percentage the output current/maximum output current? Then, can we determine the corresponding efficiency by determining the output current based on the maximum output current? Then, according to the left figure, we can use the efficiency
Details
Published on 2018-9-5 10:02
| ||
|
||
|
56
Published on 2018-9-4 20:28
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Teacher, I have a few questions about the datasheet. Let me answer them one by one. In this selection table, in the efficiency column, what do the numbers Min. (VIN)/Max. (VIN) @ full load mean, 94/91, 84/85, etc. . . . .
Details
Published on 2018-9-5 09:56
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
It turns out to be a Chinese chip with a Chinese manual. It seems I was wrong. This thing is not a linear regulator. Please post the complete datasheet. It's hard to read with so many pages.
Details
Published on 2018-9-5 10:23
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
60
Published on 2018-9-5 10:20
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190