Do parallel universes really exist?

okhxyyo

Do parallel universes really exist? [Copy link]

Hawking submitted his final scientific paper 10 days before his death, laying the theoretical foundation for the discovery of parallel universes. What do you think?

star_66666

It remains to be explored and verified. It is hard for us mortals to say for sure.

freebsder

It can only be proved theoretically (whether the theory is correct or not is another matter), but it cannot be discovered in reality. Once there is a so-called parallel universe, it must be infinite. Our dimension has not exceeded three dimensions, so we can imagine it but cannot actually do it. Just like people can imagine infinity but cannot touch infinity. Unless species evolve other senses in a few years, commonly known as opening the third eye. Many people think that the so-called practice is a scam. In fact, the real practice is to use various means and methods to stimulate the sense of another dimension. As for whether there are many scammers or it is true, there is no way to prove it. It is the same as the title: people who have not evolved that dimension cannot feel it, and people without Erlang Shen’s eyes cannot see it, so even if there is a parallel universe, it is a scam that cannot be seen by people other than Erlang Shen.

chenzhufly

The person above is a liar, a fake Taoist priest: Laugh:

okhxyyo

freebsder posted on 2018-3-20 12:39 It can only be proved theoretically (whether the theory is correct or not is another matter), it cannot be discovered in reality. If there is a so-called parallel universe, there must be infinite, and our latitude is not yet...

It seems to make some sense

chunyang

First of all, whether or not the paper was submitted is highly questionable. There is no confirmation from any formal channels. In this case, it is basically impossible. Secondly, even if there is such a major event as "laying a theoretical foundation for the discovery of parallel universes", it should be released by the academic community. There is no confirmation from any formal channels in this regard, which shows that it is still basically impossible. In the long-term social practice of the West, there has long been a tacit understanding between the academic community and the media community. The release of news involving new scientific achievements must be after the academic community reaches a consensus. There will not be the chaos of the media daring to take charge and interpret everything as in China. Finally, the existence of parallel universes must be confirmed in theory, that is, to verify their objectivity through scientific methods, and then we can talk about "discovery methods", which is already a matter of technical level. At present, parallel universes are just a conjecture, and there is not even a relevant descriptive theory, so how can we talk about "foundation of discovery".

strong161

It must be fake, they are all liars, cheating for food, drink, fame and fortune. This theory is so boring, there are so many physics in the world, but none of them have come to the conclusion that time does not flow backwards. Thermodynamics has long had a definition that absolute zero cannot be reached. Let me write a physics definition: time is unidirectional, time stillness cannot be achieved, and absolute physical stillness cannot be achieved. Write it down and teach your children, let them teach your grandchildren, and there will definitely be a generation of descendants who can prove it. These physicists have wasted too much money, and they have not yet found out that time is unidirectional.

chunyang

strong161 posted on 2018-3-20 22:02 It must be fake, they are all liars, cheating for food and drink, fame and fortune. This theory is too boring, there are so many physics studies in the world, but no conclusion has been reached...

Scientific discovery must pay attention to scientific methods, everything must be based on arguments and logical reasoning. If you advocate, you must come up with arguments and reasoning, and it must be self-consistent, not just a claim. If you just make a claim, even if your claim happens to be the same as the main argument of a scientific discovery, the discoverer is not you, and it can even be said that it has nothing to do with you.

ddllxxrr

I think it exists, no proof is needed, just like 1+1 equals 2

sybld201712

This kind of advanced problem that only appears in novels and movies is still not understood by us mortals, but it is good to propose a proof method and actively try it. As for whether time is unidirectional or just a human perception, there is no conclusion yet. Maybe when we have four-dimensional or multi-dimensional sensory organs, we will have another understanding of time and the universe.

chunyang

sybld201712 posted on 2018-3-21 16:51 This kind of advanced problem that only appears in novels and movies is still not understood by us mortals, but it is still good to propose a proof method and actively try it. As for time...

Whether time is unidirectional or not, this needs to be strictly proved. Before reliable proof is proposed, we can only say that we don’t know, and any guess based on feelings is meaningless.