584 views|11 replies

6

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

PMOS is used as PWM switch power supply. The output PWM voltage signal has negative voltage overshoot voltage for too long. Please solve it. [Copy link]

 
This post was last edited by flag2010 on 2024-10-13 12:04

See the schematic diagram below: The VBAT voltage in the circuit is 3-4.2V, and the D401/D4 Zener diode is a 4.3V Zener diode.

Q6: NPN tube LMBT4401LT1G

Q7: PNP tube: LMBT4403LT1G

Q5: NMOS tube: LNTS4409NWT1G

Q403 is AOS material: AONR21117

VBAT is the power supply for the load, the supply voltage is 3V-4.2V, and the load connected to the lower end of Q403 of PMOS is a 0.4 ohm resistor. The PWM input signal of the microcontroller is a 3.3V square wave signal with a frequency of 20KHz.

This circuit comes from: a pdf file on TI's official website, which is also a classic circuit, page 27

https://www.ti.com/lit/slua618

This is the circuit I designed:

But I found out that when the PMOS_PWM signal is input into the PWM signal, a serious negative voltage is measured at both ends of 0.4R, and the time is very long. See the oscilloscope waveform, the PWM switching frequency is 20KHz.

Can anyone help me solve the problem of how to optimize and improve the negative voltage so that the signal outputs a standard square wave signal? Now the rising and falling edges of the turn-on signal are still very fast.

The back-end tried to use a 10uF capacitor for C404, but it seriously weakened the rising and falling edge time, and the output signal was not standard. The signal tested by the oscilloscope in the figure above is the waveform when C404 is a 1uF capacitor.

LMBT4401LT1G.pdf

554.04 KB, downloads: 1

Q6的NPN驱动管子

LNTS4409NWT1G.pdf

449.43 KB, downloads: 2

Q5 PWM驱动NMOS

LMBT4403LT1G.pdf

493.89 KB, downloads: 1

Q7的PNP驱动管子

AONR21117.pdf

545.04 KB, downloads: 4

Q403功率PMOS

This post is from Power technology

Latest reply

The negative voltage at 0.4R is probably caused by the Miller effect of PMOS. Try reducing R5 or try another tube. The Coss of this tube is 770pF, which is relatively large.   Details Published on 2024-10-13 19:57
 
 

6593

Posts

0

Resources
2
 

It's all C404's fault.

Remove it and optimize again

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

6

Posts

0

Resources
3
 
Jacktang posted on 2024-10-13 08:36 It was C404 that made a fuss and removed it, and then re-optimized it

The effect of canceling C404 is the same. I have tried it, and the negative voltage is too long. And the negative amplitude is larger.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
4
 

Where are the 1/2/3 pins of the P-channel MOS tube connected to in the first post? What other components are on this NET? Is it only the VBAT2357?

This post is from Power technology

Comments

I have updated the post and the description is more complete. Please help me take a look. VBAT is directly connected to a 4.2V lithium battery, and the operating voltage range is 3V-4.2V. The connection method of the transistor is designed based on the information on TI's official website.  Details Published on 2024-10-13 12:07
 
 
 

2w

Posts

0

Resources
5
 

The connection method of transistor Q7 in the first post is wrong anyway, and the voltage direction is wrong.

How many V does VBAT2357 have?

This post is from Power technology

Comments

Does this mean that Q7 2/3 is connected in reverse, causing the voltage at the G and D poles to not be released quickly when the PMPS is turned off?  Details Published on 2024-10-13 12:29
 
 
 

75

Posts

0

Resources
6
 

The intention is to use Q6/Q7 to drive the MOSFET, but this drive circuit is seriously wrong. What is the VTH of the MOSFET? Also, where is the drain of the MOSFET connected? Please give me the picture so that I can analyze it.

This post is from Power technology

Comments

This circuit is based on the design in TI's official data. Please help me find out where the design problem lies. The VTH voltage of the PMOS driving the 0.4R resistor is typically -0.7V. For detailed specifications, see the screenshot or the data in the post. Please help me find out where the problem lies. The output at both ends of 0.4R appears except when it is turned off.  Details Published on 2024-10-13 12:13
 
 
 

6

Posts

0

Resources
7
 
maychang posted on 2024-10-13 11:11 Where are the 1/2/3 pins of the P-channel MOS tube in the first post connected to? What other components are there on this NET? Is it only VBAT2357?

I have updated the post and the description is more complete. Please help me take a look. VBAT is directly connected to a 4.2V lithium battery, and the operating voltage range is 3V-4.2V. The connection method of the transistor is designed based on the information on TI's official website.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

6

Posts

0

Resources
8
 
davidzhu210 posted on 2024-10-13 11:19 The intention is to use Q6/Q7 to drive the MOSFET, but this drive circuit is seriously wrong. What is the VTH of the MOSFET? Also, where is the drain of the MOSFET connected? Give the picture to everyone...

This circuit is based on the design in TI's official data. Please help me find out where the design problem lies.

The VTH voltage of the PMOS driving resistor 0.4R is typically -0.7V. See the screenshot or the information in the post for detailed specifications. Please help me find out where the problem is. The output of both ends of 0.4R has a serious negative voltage for too long when it is turned off, but no serious overshoot and ringing are obviously seen when it is turned on.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

6

Posts

0

Resources
9
 
This post was last edited by flag2010 on 2024-10-13 15:29
maychang posted on 2024-10-13 11:13 The connection method of transistor Q7 in the first post is wrong anyway, and the voltage direction is wrong. How many V does VBAT2357 have?

Does it mean that Q7 is connected in reverse 2/3, causing the voltage at the G and D poles to not be released quickly when the PMPS is turned off?
I connected the PNP tube in reverse 2/3, and the phenomenon is actually the same. Or the negative voltage lasts too long.

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

75

Posts

0

Resources
10
 

Do you mean measuring current? Maximum 10A

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

75

Posts

0

Resources
11
 

The negative voltage at 0.4R is probably caused by the Miller effect of PMOS. Try reducing R5 or try another tube. The Coss of this tube is 770pF, which is relatively large.

This post is from Power technology

Comments

I replaced it with a new Clean Energy PMOS (model NCE30P25Q), but the effect was still not ideal, so I directly raised the G-level voltage to 5V. [attachimg]854174[/attachimg]   Details Published on 2024-10-23 16:57
 
 
 

6

Posts

0

Resources
12
 
davidzhu210 posted on 2024-10-13 19:57 The negative pressure at 0.4R should be caused by the Miller effect of PMOS. Try reducing R5 or try another tube. The Coss of this tube is 770pF, which is relatively...

I replaced it with a new Clean Energy PMOS (model NCE30P25Q), but the effect was still not ideal, so I directly raised the G-level voltage to 5V.

NCE30P25Q.pdf

682.09 KB, downloads: 0

This post is from Power technology
 
 
 

Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list