The OP
Published on 2024-5-15 14:56
Only look at the author
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
Latest reply
This post was last edited by dukedz on 2024-5-22 10:03
Self-developed. Currently, low-end communications on the market use CAN and 485 interfaces, while high-end communications use ethercat.
The low-end performance is not good. The above mentioned the problem of synchronization cycle, and the high-end is too complicated and the price is outrageous. The project cycle will be very long.
So I would choose the enhanced version of 485 communication, taking into account simplicity, performance, reliability and low cost:
https://bbs.eeworld.com.cn/thread-1267965-1-1.html
Details
Published on 2024-5-22 10:00
| ||
|
||
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
| ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2024-5-15 15:20
Only look at the author
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
Comments
Industrial fields, such as automated production lines, machine tools, laser cutting, etc., will use
Details
Published on 2024-5-17 09:36
| ||
|
||
|
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
| ||
|
||
|
5
Published on 2024-5-17 09:36
Only look at the author
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
| ||
|
||
|
7
Published on 2024-5-22 10:00
Only look at the author
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
Comments | ||
|
||
|
This post is from Industrial Control Electronics
| ||
|
||
|
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190