2713 views|8 replies

3255

Posts

0

Resources
The OP
 

The MOS used in full-bridge, half-bridge, and push-pull circuits are generally NMOS, especially at the high-voltage end. PMOS is rarely seen. This... [Copy link]

The MOS used in full-bridge, half-bridge and push-pull circuits are generally NMOS, especially at the high-voltage end. PMOS is rarely seen. What is the consideration for this? From which aspects can it be analyzed?

1. NMOS has higher voltage resistance and simpler process?

2.

3........

Welcome to Solitaire

This post is from Discrete Device

Latest reply

For nmos and pmos with the same process and size, pmos has a larger on-resistance, so pmos is less efficient and is not suitable for high-power applications. Find the manuals of nmos and pmos of the same size package (even 2 MOS in one package), the same manufacturer and the same series, and compare the on-resistance.   Details Published on 2023-12-18 11:26
 
 

2w

Posts

341

Resources
2
 

The manufacturing reasons lead to price reasons. Hole conduction is more difficult to process than electron conduction.

PMOS is often used in the full bridge. Two PMOS are connected to the top as the upper bridge arm, and two NMOS are connected to the bottom as the lower bridge arm. This circuit is often used.

This post is from Discrete Device

Comments

Can't all four MOS use N tubes?  Details Published on 2022-12-6 16:16
 
 
 

3255

Posts

0

Resources
3
 
qwqwqw2088 posted on 2022-12-3 20:01 The manufacturing reasons lead to the price reasons. The process of hole conduction is more difficult than that of electron conduction. PMOS is often useful in the full bridge. Two PMOS are connected on top...

Can't all four MOS use N tubes?

This post is from Discrete Device
 
 
 

1

Posts

0

Resources
4
 
QWE4562009 posted on 2022-12-6 16:16 Can't all four MOS use N tubes?

Yes, but that requires a higher voltage to drive the high-side NMOS, and an additional power supply or a bootstrap circuit. In short, it means adding components and money, and the complexity is also increased.

This post is from Discrete Device
 
 
 

889

Posts

0

Resources
5
 

Generally, NMOS has a smaller on-resistance than PMOS, a lower price than PMOS, and is easier to buy.

This post is from Discrete Device
 
 
 

889

Posts

0

Resources
6
 

At low voltage, the full-bridge upper tube can also use PMOS, which will make the driving circuit simpler.

This post is from Discrete Device

Comments

Why can't PMOS be used when high voltage is applied?  Details Published on 2023-12-15 16:36
 
 
 

3255

Posts

0

Resources
7
 
fjdeepblue posted on 2023-12-15 16:05 When the voltage is low, PMOS can also be used for the full-bridge upper tube, which will make the driving circuit simpler

Why can't PMOS be used when high voltage is used?

This post is from Discrete Device

Comments

At high voltage, PMOS cannot be driven directly by transistors because the power consumption of the transistors responsible for level shifting is too high. Therefore, at high voltage, the driving circuit of PMOS is basically the same as that of NMOS, and using NMOS has more advantages.  Details Published on 2023-12-16 07:55
 
 
 

889

Posts

0

Resources
8
 
QWE4562009 posted on 2023-12-15 16:36 Why can't PMOS be used when high voltage is applied

At high voltage, PMOS cannot be driven directly by transistors because the power consumption of the transistors responsible for level shifting is too high. Therefore, at high voltage, the driving circuit of PMOS is basically the same as that of NMOS, and using NMOS has more advantages.

This post is from Discrete Device
 
 
 

202

Posts

0

Resources
9
 

For nmos and pmos with the same process and size, pmos has a larger on-resistance, so pmos is less efficient and is not suitable for high-power applications.

Find the manuals of nmos and pmos of the same size package (even 2 MOS in one package), the same manufacturer and the same series, and compare the on-resistance.

This post is from Discrete Device
 
 
 

Find a datasheet?

EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support

EEWorld
subscription
account

EEWorld
service
account

Automotive
development
circle

Copyright © 2005-2024 EEWORLD.com.cn, Inc. All rights reserved 京B2-20211791 京ICP备10001474号-1 电信业务审批[2006]字第258号函 京公网安备 11010802033920号
快速回复 返回顶部 Return list