4837 views|23 replies
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
The OP
Published on 2021-2-18 10:28
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Latest reply | |
|
||
2
Published on 2021-2-18 10:41
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
So what is the specific working principle and practicality?
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 10:43
| ||
|
||
|
3
Published on 2021-2-18 10:42
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
"Then what is the specific working principle and practicality?" Working principle: Two amplifiers in cascade are still an amplifier. Just like two resistors in series are still a resistor. Q1Q2 and U3 are still an amplifier after cascading. When working in a linear state, the non-inverting input terminal and the inverting input terminal are required to be
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 10:57
"Then what is the specific working principle and practicality?" Working principle: Two amplifiers in cascade are still an amplifier. Just like two resistors in series are still a resistor. Q1Q2 and U3 are still an amplifier after cascading. When working in a linear state, the non-inverting input terminal and the inverting input terminal are required to be
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 10:53
| |
|
||
|
5
Published on 2021-2-18 10:44
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
6
Published on 2021-2-18 10:53
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
7
Published on 2021-2-18 10:57
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
[attachimg]525124[/attachimg]I just checked, it seems to be ±18V. I tried to use a MOS tube, but then there is no voltage on the load resistor. . .
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 11:10
[attachimg]525124[/attachimg]I just checked, it seems to be ±18V. I tried to use a MOS tube, but then there is no voltage on the load resistor. . .
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 11:04
| ||
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
| |
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
If you want to keep a constant nA or uA current, such a circuit is basically unusable, because the leakage current between the drain and source of a low-power MOS tube is at the uA level.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 12:18
If you want to keep a constant nA or uA current, such a circuit is basically unusable, because the leakage current between the drain and source of a low-power MOS tube is at the uA level.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 11:31
| |
|
||
|
10
Published on 2021-2-18 11:27
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
11
Published on 2021-2-18 11:31
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Thanks, that's me. In the second post I designed a simple Howland circuit, but I don't know how to add the FET.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 13:11
| ||
|
||
|
12
Published on 2021-2-18 12:18
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Since the Howland circuit is used and the output current is only at the uA level, there is no need to use a field effect tube, and the op amp can output directly. Any type of op amp can output 1mA level current.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 14:14
| |
|
||
|
14
Published on 2021-2-18 13:47
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
It's like this, I'm a student, it's my first time to come into contact with this kind of thing, and then the teacher asked me to make a constant current source to power the accelerometer. Our teacher didn't do much research in this area, and I heard that he meant to design a constant current source based on field effect tubes, like the Howland constant current source mentioned by teacher Maychang. I'm afraid if
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 15:43
| ||
Personal signature上传了一些书籍资料,也许有你想要的:https://download.eeworld.com.cn/user/chunyang
|
||
|
15
Published on 2021-2-18 14:11
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
16
Published on 2021-2-18 14:14
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
OK, then in this case, we need to focus on the choice of op amp, right? This is a single power supply, right? And is the ideal op amp suitable for current simulation design? [attachimg]525152[/attachimg]
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 15:45
| ||
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Then you should understand what Maychang means by the significant impact of leakage current and op amp parameters on accuracy? I always feel that you are nitpicking, and there is no "alternative approach" here, and it has nothing to do with simplicity. The first thing you should solve is to understand what Maychang is talking about.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 17:28
| |
|
||
|
fishsheep1919
Currently offline
|
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
If you use a three-terminal ideal op amp for simulation, there is no limit on the power supply, assuming it is a dual power supply and the power supply voltage is infinite. If it is a five-terminal ideal op amp, there is a limit on the output voltage of the op amp, but there is no offset temperature drift, etc.
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 16:16
| |
|
||
|
19
Published on 2021-2-18 16:16
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
| ||
|
||
|
20
Published on 2021-2-18 17:28
Only look at the author
This post is from Analog electronics
Comments
Thanks for your guidance, is there any recommended information?
Details
Published on 2021-2-18 20:43
| ||
Personal signature上传了一些书籍资料,也许有你想要的:https://download.eeworld.com.cn/user/chunyang
|
||
|
论坛威望大于30000或网友提名:坛子里公认的技术导师
EEWorld Datasheet Technical Support
EEWorld
subscription
account
EEWorld
service
account
Automotive
development
circle
About Us Customer Service Contact Information Datasheet Sitemap LatestNews
Room 1530, Zhongguancun MOOC Times Building, Block B, 18 Zhongguancun Street, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China Tel:(010)82350740 Postcode:100190