yang_max

I have experience in developing LPC1104. I don't know if this model is correct. It's been a while. What is its purpose? I have developed Nb.iot. Thank you.

zzz_2003

I played with LPC1769 when it first came out, so I don’t know if I can be considered an experienced person. Now I am mainly interested in low-power Internet of Things. I am currently developing TI’s simplelink, which has ultra-low power consumption and sleep mode of 2uA. Let me ask you, how does NXP compare to TI?

yinxx

I follow, I pay attention, I participate, I gain

zhjb1

If you have used and developed CPC824, 854, 54606, etc., you should be familiar with this kind of SDK. 1. Download the information to learn 2. Design several experiments to further master the use of common things such as GPIO, ADC, PWM, timer, etc. 3. Implement wireless sampling and IO control 4. As always, share ideas and codes

tobot

LPC8N04 application: I was attracted by the WeChat push. Personal description: I have some development experience. Personally, I like to use my imagination, such as transforming a calculator into a rock-paper-scissors machine (the prize of the next-door website http://bbs.cirmall.com/thread-48362-1-1.html). But I have no experience in NFC development. Reasons for wanting to participate in the evaluation: Because I feel a little empty recently, I want to make some tentative breakthroughs in the development and learning of NFC. Evaluation content: Complete the basic evaluation work, and should be able to complete ①②③. I am not sure if I can complete ④, and ⑤ depends on inspiration. Evaluation plan: ①② should be completed within two weeks. As for ③, I can guarantee that I can write an average of no less than 500 words of experience per week based on ①②, and it can last for at least one month.

tobot

Why does my application still need to be reviewed? Is there any sensitive words in my application?

tobot

tobot posted on 2018-5-30 21:58 Why does the application still need to be reviewed? Is there any sensitive words in my application?

I have applied, but the application needs to be reviewed

tobot

Got it, it's because there's a link to the work in it, delete it and apply again Personal description: I have some development experience. Personally, I like to use my imagination and make magic changes, such as transforming a calculator into a rock-paper-scissors machine. But I don't have any NFC development experience. Reasons for wanting to participate in the evaluation: Because I feel a little empty recently, I want to make some tentative breakthroughs in the development and learning of NFC. Evaluation content: Complete the basic evaluation work, should be able to complete ①②③, ④ is not guaranteed to be completed, ⑤ depends on inspiration. Evaluation plan: ①② should be completed within two weeks. As for ③, I can guarantee an average of no less than 500 words of experience per week based on ①②, and it can last at least one month.

BinWin

(I) Application reason: Since I have been doing wireless-related work, I have also paid attention to NFC. This LPC8N04 contains the M0+ core and supports mainstream development tools. In particular, the onboard resources can easily implement some development and verification. I have used NXP's dual-core LPC series chips and am familiar with the SDK. With great interest and ideas, I applied to experience this board and use it to design an electronic lock that can use mobile phone NFC. (II) Project and plan: (1) Onboard debugger, with LED array and speaker. Therefore, the first task is to be familiar with the operation and development of the modified card and be able to skillfully control the peripheral hardware. (2) Communication test, use the mobile phone APP to send information to the development board (the information can be alphanumeric or text), and the development board will display the received information through the LED dot matrix. (3) Use this development board to simulate a bus card reader, read the information from the other end and display it, or use the speaker to sound a prompt through the jumper. (4) Through the above content, you can be familiar with the use of the board. The focus of the electronic lock is the security mechanism of the mobile phone and the development board. Consider using a custom protocol to reflect the application of one-to-one or many-to-one electronic locks. (5) Focus on the electronic lock project, and test some other NFC devices to increase the fun. (III) Expected results: Familiarize yourself with the board and design functions according to the plan of No. 2 Middle School, and record the process in the forum in time to share the experience. Or summarize the project process as a basic function evaluation, complete the evaluation requirements of the activity, and finally design a small project prototype.

okhxyyo

tobot posted on 2018-5-30 21:59 I have applied, but the application needs to be reviewed

I have replied to you and it has been reviewed and approved

sptt1

Apply for evaluation - Familiar with the use of MCUs from major manufacturers; - Participated in the KW41 competition at eeworld and finally completed the work; - Used TI's NFC solution; - Hope to learn more about NXP's NFC solution through evaluation. 2. Evaluation content a: Unboxing evaluation; b: Evaluation of each function; c: Evaluation of NFC's active and passive modes; d: Creative small design and in-depth evaluation I haven't thought about the specific content yet, and the specific content will depend on what I have at hand. 3. In the end, there may be 3~5 posts to describe the content of each part of the review. If time permits, we can make 1~2 videos like the KW41 competition (tentative). By the way, does each person have two sets of boards, or only one?

yyhhgg

Applying to develop active electronic tags is very consistent with the products we are engaged in

okhxyyo

sptt1 posted on 2018-5-31 15:38 Apply for evaluation - Familiar with the use of MCUs from major manufacturers; - Participated in the KW41 competition at eeworld and finally completed the work; - Used TI's NFC solution...

A set of boards

guoqingcai

Apply for evaluation - Familiar with the use of MCUs from various mainstream manufacturers, starting from C8051, and experienced AVR, STM, LPC, etc.; - Participated in an evaluation of a development board at eeworld, submitted works and reports, and finally completed the work and won the last prize; - Combined with the company's internal medical product inspection and testing process, the tester misused the wrong standard mold and caused an accident, and wanted to develop practical small applications in this regard; - Have experience in the application of MIFAR, specifically the STM+RC5XX series of chips, - Hope to learn more about NXP's NFC solution through evaluation. 2. Evaluation content 1/: Unboxing evaluation; 2/: Evaluation of the use of each function; 3/: Creative small design of NFC, mainly combined with the actual situation within the company; BTW. I asked a new colleague who just graduated, and he was also very interested in practicing it once, especially since NFC is very popular now, and I hope to have this opportunity;

47857872

LPC8N04 development board application (1) Brief introduction: I have experience in small NFC projects before, and LPC's microcontroller has only been used to make open source software radio boards (2) Reason for application: Try this LPC board to see if micropython can be ported on this board (3) Evaluation content: Complete the basic evaluation as required and use this board to complete the production of a new demo (4) Evaluation plan: Make a demo and evaluate the document

okhxyyo

47857872 Published on 2018-6-5 17:52 LPC8N04 Development Board Application (1) Brief Introduction: I have experience in small NFC projects before, and LPC's microcontrollers have only been used for open source software...

Hello, the application period has ended. The list is out

tobot

Received it. The logistics is really bad. The person who signed for me even lost it. . .

okhxyyo

tobot posted on 2018-6-10 23:43 I received it. The logistics is really bad. Some people even lost the package when signing for them. . .

_, fortunately, I received it.